Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

A meeting of the Traffic Committee will be held at 9.30am in Council Chambers, Merrylands Administration Building, 16 Memorial Avenue, Merrylands on Wednesday, 2 March 2022.

ORDER OF BUSINESS

 

1.         Apologies

 

2.         Declarations of Interest

 

3.         Confirmation of Previous Minutes

 

4.         Summary of Reports........................................................................................................ 5

 

5.         Reports

CTC-22-001. CHISWICK ROAD, AUBURN AT HARROW ROAD– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS................................................................. 23

CTC-22-002. CHURCH STREET, LIDCOMBE– PROPOSED ‘LEFT TURN ONLY’ SIGN..................................................................................................................... 25

CTC-22-003. EXCELSIOR STREET AND BESZANT STREET, MERRYLANDS– PROPOSED EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS....................................................................................... 29

CTC-22-004. FOWLER ROAD, MERRYLANDS AT THE INTERSETION OF WARIALDA STREET– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING.......................................................................................... 31

CTC-22-005. TOONGABBIE ROAD, TOONGABBIE – PROPOSED PART-TIME SCHOOL BUS ZONE SIGNS................................................................. 33

CTC-22-006. WHALANS ROAD AND LAWRY STREET, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT.............................................................. 35

CTC-22-007. CLUCAS ROAD AND AMY STREET, REGENTS PARK – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS.................................................................................. 39

CTC-22-008. FRANCES STREET AND BENSON STREET, SOUTH WENTWORTHVILLE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING.......................................................................................... 41

CTC-22-009. OCTAVIA STREET AND AURELIA STREET, TOONGABBIE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINE MARKING... 43

CTC-22-010. OCTAVIA STREET AND TOONGABBIE ROAD, TOONGABBIE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING.... 45

CTC-22-011. WARWICK ROAD AND LEEDS STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING............................ 47

CTC-22-012. ELIZABETH STREET, GUILDFORD AT THE INTERSETION OF CECIL STREET– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS AND LINE MARKING.................................................................................................. 49

CTC-22-013. ELIZABETH STREET, GUILDFORD AT THE INTERSETION OF O’NEILL STREET – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS............... 51

CTC-22-014. PENDLE WAY, PENDLE HILL – RELOCATE EXISTING  PEAK PERIOD ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGN............................................................................. 53

CTC-22-015. VAUGHAN STREET AND AUBURN ROAD, AUBURN – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT.............................................................. 55

CTC-22-016. HOLDSWORTH STREET, MERRYLANDS AT PRICE STREET– ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS.............................................................................. 59

CTC-22-017. BERITH ROAD, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS.... 63

CTC-22-018. BRADMAN STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS    67

CTC-22-019. WARATAH STREET, GRANVILLE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 71

CTC-22-020. BERRY STREET, REGENTS PARK – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 75

CTC-22-021. BURFORD STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS    79

CTC-22-022. DAVIDSON STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 83

CTC-22-023. EARL STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS... 87

CTC-22-024. EDWIN STREET, REGENTS PARK – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 91

CTC-22-025. HANBURY STREET, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS     95

CTC-22-026. HARRY AVENUE, LIDCOMBE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS...... 99

CTC-22-027. LACKEY STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 103

CTC-22-028. LANSDOWNE STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS................................................................................................................... 107

CTC-22-029. NICHOLAS STREET, LIDCOMBE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 111

CTC-22-030. ST ANN STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 115

CTC-22-031. AUBURN ROAD, AUBURN – PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF MEDIAN ISLAND.................................................................................................... 119

CTC-22-032. BLIGH STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS... 121

CTC-22-033. GILLIVERS PLACE AND MILLS STREET, LIDCOMBE  – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS............................................................................................ 125

CTC-22-034. ROAD CLOSURES IN THE AUBURN CBD FOR RAMADAN FOOD FESTIVAL 2022...................................................................................... 129

CTC-22-035. GILBA ROAD, GIRRAWEEN – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS....... 131

CTC-22-036. LUMLEY STREET, GRANVILLE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS. 135

CTC-22-037. EDGAR STREET AND GIBBS STREET, AUBURN - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022.......................................................................... 139

CTC-22-038. EXCELSIOR STREET AND BRIGHT STREET, GUILDFORD - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022........................................................... 143

CTC-22-039. HARRIS STREET AND MORRIS STREET, MERRYLANDS - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022........................................................... 147

CTC-22-040. ROSEBERY ROAD AND RHODES AVENUE, GUILDFORD - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022........................................................... 151

CTC-22-041. TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE FOR ‘GRANVILLE ACTIVATION 2022’ FUNDING AGREEMENT...................................................................... 155

CTC-22-042. BELMONT STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS    157

CTC-22-043. CUMBERLAND ROAD, AUBURN – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 161

CTC-22-044. DRIFTWAY DRIVE, PEMULWUY – REQUEST TO REMOVE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE........................................................................ 165

CTC-22-045. KIRKHAM ROAD, AUBURN – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS........ 169

CTC-22-046. PENDLE WAY, PENDLE HILL – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS.... 173

CTC-22-047. WILLOUGHBY STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 177

CTC-22-048. PERCY STREET, AUBURN – PROPOSED PARKING RESTRICTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION............... 181

CTC-22-049. WHALANS ROAD, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS 185

CTC-22-050. PARK ROAD, BERALA AT YORK STREET - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022................................................................................................ 189

CTC-22-051. JOHN STREET, LIDCOMBE AT THE INTERSETION OF ELIMATTA STREET AND EDITH STREET– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS AND LINE MARKING.............................................. 191

CTC-22-052. KERR PARADE, AUBURN– APPLICATION FOR ‘WORKS ZONE’ SIGNAGE................................................................................................. 193

CTC-22-053. LOCKWOOD STREET AND LEEDS STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING.. 195

CTC-22-054. NEIL STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED LEFT IN / LEFT OUT ARRANGEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION................................................................................................................... 197

CTC-22-055. BLAXCELL STREET, GRANVILLE – REVIEW OF PROPOSED RELOCATION OF THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND ASSOCIATED SIGNAGE – FEDERAL STIMULUS PROGRAM............................... 199

 

6.         Other Business

 

7.         Next Meeting

 

The next meeting of the Traffic Committee is to be held on Wednesday, 6 April 2022.

 

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

Summary of Reports

 

Item #

Title

Electorate

Police Area Command (PAC)

Fairfield

Granville

Prospect

Auburn

Cumberland

Auburn

CTC-22-001

CHISWICK ROAD, AUBURN AT HARROW ROAD– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-002

CHURCH STREET, LIDCOMBE– PROPOSED ‘LEFT TURN ONLY’ SIGN

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-003

EXCELSIOR STREET AND BESZANT STREET, MERRYLANDS– PROPOSED EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-004

FOWLER ROAD, MERRYLANDS AT THE INTERSETION OF WARIALDA STREET– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-005

TOONGABBIE ROAD, TOONGABBIE – PROPOSED PART-TIME SCHOOL BUS ZONE SIGNS

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-006

WHALANS ROAD AND LAWRY STREET, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-007

CLUCAS ROAD AND AMY STREET, REGENTS PARK – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-008

FRANCES STREET AND BENSON STREET, SOUTH WENTWORTHVILLE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-009

OCTAVIA STREET AND AURELIA STREET, TOONGABBIE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINE MARKING

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-010

OCTAVIA STREET AND TOONGABBIE ROAD, TOONGABBIE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-011

WARWICK ROAD AND LEEDS STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-012

ELIZABETH STREET, GUILDFORD AT THE INTERSETION OF CECIL STREET– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS AND LINE MARKING

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-013

ELIZABETH STREET, GUILDFORD AT THE INTERSETION OF O’NEILL STREET – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-014

PENDLE WAY, PENDLE HILL – RELOCATE EXISTING  PEAK PERIOD ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGN

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-015

VAUGHAN STREET AND AUBURN ROAD, AUBURN – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-016

HOLDSWORTH STREET, MERRYLANDS AT PRICE STREET– ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-017

BERITH ROAD, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-018

BRADMAN STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-019

WARATAH STREET, GRANVILLE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-020

BERRY STREET, REGENTS PARK – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-021

BURFORD STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-022

DAVIDSON STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

´

 

CTC-22-023

EARL STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-024

EDWIN STREET, REGENTS PARK – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-025

HANBURY STREET, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-026

HARRY AVENUE, LIDCOMBE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-027

LACKEY STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-028

LANSDOWNE STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-029

NICHOLAS STREET, LIDCOMBE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-030

ST ANN STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-031

AUBURN ROAD, AUBURN – PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF MEDIAN ISLAND

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-032

BLIGH STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

´

 

CTC-22-033

GILLIVERS PLACE AND MILLS STREET, LIDCOMBE  – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-034

ROAD CLOSURES IN THE AUBURN CBD FOR RAMADAN FOOD FESTIVAL 2022

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-035

GILBA ROAD, GIRRAWEEN – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-036

LUMLEY STREET, GRANVILLE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-037

EDGAR STREET AND GIBBS STREET, AUBURN - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-038

EXCELSIOR STREET AND BRIGHT STREET, GUILDFORD - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

 

 

 

´

´

 

CTC-22-039

HARRIS STREET AND MORRIS STREET, MERRYLANDS - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-040

ROSEBERY ROAD AND RHODES AVENUE, GUILDFORD - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-041

TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE FOR ‘GRANVILLE ACTIVATION 2022’ FUNDING AGREEMENT

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-042

BELMONT STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-043

CUMBERLAND ROAD, AUBURN – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-044

DRIFTWAY DRIVE, PEMULWUY – REQUEST TO REMOVE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-045

KIRKHAM ROAD, AUBURN – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-046

PENDLE WAY, PENDLE HILL – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-047

WILLOUGHBY STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

 

´

´

 

CTC-22-048

PERCY STREET, AUBURN – PROPOSED PARKING RESTRICTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-049

WHALANS ROAD, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-22-050

PARK ROAD, BERALA AT YORK STREET - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-051

JOHN STREET, LIDCOMBE AT THE INTERSETION OF ELIMATTA STREET AND EDITH STREET– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS AND LINE MARKING

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-052

KERR PARADE, AUBURN– APPLICATION FOR ‘WORKS ZONE’ SIGNAGE

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-22-053

LOCKWOOD STREET AND LEEDS STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-054

NEIL STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED LEFT IN / LEFT OUT ARRANGEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-22-055

BLAXCELL STREET, GRANVILLE – REVIEW OF PROPOSED RELOCATION OF THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND ASSOCIATED SIGNAGE – FEDERAL STIMULUS PROGRAM

 

´

 

 

´

 

 

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

Minutes of the meeting Electronic Meeting of the Traffic Committee on Wednesday 3 November 2021.

Present:

Cumberland Council -                           Clr Paul Garrard – Chairman

                                                         Clr Eddy Sarkis – Deputy Chair

Transport for NSW (TfNSW) -                   Ms Irene Xu – Concurrence received for all items with amendment to one item.

Local Member for Auburn -                        Clr George Campbell – Concurrence received for all relevant items.

Local Member for Fairfield -                       Mr George Barcha – No objections received.

Local Member for Granville -                     Mr Chris Worthington – Concurrence received for all relevant items.

Local Member for Prospect -                     Clr Suman Saha – Concurrence received for relevant items.

Auburn Police Area Command -                Leading S/Const. NevillConcurrence received for all relevant items.

Cumberland Police Area Command -       Leading S/Const. Graham - Concurrence received for all relevant items.

State Transit Authority-                            No objections received.  

Transdev -                                               No objections received.

CDBus -                                                         Concurrence received.

  Transit Systems -                                       No objections received.

Apologies:

 

Declarations Of Interest

 

Nil

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

Summary of reports


Summary of Reports

 

Item #

Title

Electorate

Police Area Command (PAC)

Fairfield

Granville

Prospect

Auburn

Cumberland

Auburn

CTC-21-209

BOOREA STREET, LIDCOMBE – PROPOSED RELOCATION OF ROUNDABOUT WARNING SIGN ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-21-210

MARY STREET AND THE AVENUE, GRANVILLE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-21-211

NEWPORT STREET AND DRIFTWAY DRIVE, PEMULWUY – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT.

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-212

FAIRFIELD ROAD AND FORAY STREET, YENNORA – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

´

 

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-213

DELLWOOD STREET, SOUTH GRANVILLE – CHANGES TO EXISTING PARKING RESTRICTIONS.

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-21-214

CAMERON STREET AND WOODBURN ROAD, LIDCOMBE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-21-215

CARNATION STREET, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED ‘BUS ZONE SIGNS

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-216

GARDENIA PARADE, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED ‘BUS ZONE SIGNS

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-217

PRITCHARD STREET EAST, WENTWORTHVILLE – PROPOSED ‘NO PARKING’ SIGNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-218

LENA PLACE AND BURNETT STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-219

WHALANS ROAD AND LAWRY STREET, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-220

CAMPBELL HILL ROAD, GUILDFORD – PROPOSED ‘BUS ZONE SIGNS

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-21-221

WENTWORTH STREET AND KARRABAH ROAD, AUBURN – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-21-222

HYLAND ROAD, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED CHANGES TO ‘NO PARKING’ RESTRICTIONS

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-223

AURELIA STREET, TOONGABBIE – APPLICATION FOR ‘WORKS ZONE’ SIGNAGE

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-224

HYACINTH STREET, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-225

CUTCLIFFE AVENUE AND JOSEPH STREET, REGENTS PARK – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND CENTRE LINE MARKING

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-21-226

FREDERICK AVENUE AND LAVINIA STREET, SOUTH GRANVILLE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

 

 

 

´

´

 

CTC-21-227

WOODPARK ROAD, SMITHFIELD – REQUEST FOR 1/2 HOUR PARKING RESTRICTIONS.

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-228

MCFARLANE STREET, MERRYLANDS– CHANGES TO EXISTING PARKING RESTRICTIONS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-229

NORTHCOTE STREET, AUBURN – REQUEST FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING

 

 

 

´

 

´

CTC-21-230

BANDO ROAD, GIRRAWEEN –PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING RAISED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-231

BATHURST STREET, GREYTANES - PROPOSED RELOCATION AND RAISING OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

 

 

´

 

´

 

CTC-21-232

BRAESIDE ROAD, GREYTANES - PROPOSED RAISING OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-233

FAIRFIELD ROAD, GUILDFORD WEST–PROPOSED RAISED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

´

 

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-234

HILLTOP ROAD, MERRYLANDS  – PROPOSED RAISED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-235

RINGROSE AVENUE, GREYTANES - PROPOSED RAISING OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-236

TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE FOR ‘AUSTRALIA DAY’ CELEBRATIONS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-237

CARDIGAN STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-238

GRANVILLE RAILWAY DISASTER MEMORIAL – PROPOSED TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE OF CARLTON STREET, GRANVILLE

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-239

GUILDFORD ROAD AND ROBERTSON STREET, GUILDFORD –INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROVISION OF A ROUNDABOUT

 

 

 

´

´

 

CTC-21-240

RUTH STREET, MERRYLANDS WEST– REQUEST FOR BANNING OF RIGHT TURNS INTO THE STREET

 

´

 

 

´

 

CTC-21-241

TERRY STREET, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED SPEED HUMPS

 

´

 

 

´

 

 

 


 

REPORTS

 

ITEM CTC-21-209 - BOOREA STREET, LIDCOMBE – PROPOSED RELOCATION OF ROUNDABOUT WARNING SIGN ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended that:

1.      The proposed relocation of the ‘Roundabout Ahead’ warning sign in front of 27 Boorea Street, Lidcombe in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The cost associated with the relocation of the sign shall be borne by the applicant at no cost to Council.

3.      The applicant be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-210 - MARY STREET AND THE AVENUE, GRANVILLE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed extension of ‘No Stopping’ zones at the intersection of Mary Street and The Avenue, Granville in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-211 - NEWPORT STREET AND DRIFTWAY DRIVE, PEMULWUY – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT.

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended that the installation of ‘BB’ centre line marking at the intersection of Newport Street and Driftway Drive, Pemulwuy in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-212 - FAIRFIELD ROAD AND FORAY STREET, YENNORA – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs and ‘BB’ centre line at the intersection of Foray Street with Fairfield Road, Yennora in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent businesses be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-213 - DELLWOOD STREET, SOUTH GRANVILLE – CHANGES TO EXISTING PARKING RESTRICTIONS.

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended that:

1.      The changes to the existing parking arrangement on Dellwood Street, South Granville in accordance with the attached plan be approved subject to Australia Post relocating the mailbox.

2.      The adjacent businesses be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-214 - CAMERON STREET AND WOODBURN ROAD, LIDCOMBE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ zones and ‘BB’ line marking at the intersection of Cameron Street with Woodburn Road, Lidcombe in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-215 - CARNATION STREET, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED ‘BUS ZONE SIGNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The installation of ‘Bus Zone’ signs on Carnation Street, Greystanes in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-216 - GARDENIA PARADE, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED ‘BUS ZONE SIGNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The installation of ‘Bus Zone’ signs on Gardenia Parade, Greystanes in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-217 - PRITCHARD STREET EAST, WENTWORTHVILLE – PROPOSED ‘NO PARKING’ SIGNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Parking’ signs on Pritchard Street East, Wentworthville in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent properties be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-218 - LENA PLACE AND BURNETT STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ zones and ‘BB’ line marking at the intersection of Lena Place and Burnett Street, Merrylands in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-219 - WHALANS ROAD AND LAWRY STREET, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ zones and ‘BB’ line marking at the intersection of Whalans Road and Lawry Street, Greystanes in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-220 - CAMPBELL HILL ROAD, GUILDFORD – PROPOSED ‘BUS ZONE SIGNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The installation of ‘Bus Zone’ signs on Campbell Hill Road, Guildford in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-221 - WENTWORTH STREET AND KARRABAH ROAD, AUBURN – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ zones and ‘BB’ line marking at the intersection of Wentworth Street and Karrabah Road, Auburn in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-222 - HYLAND ROAD, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED CHANGES TO ‘NO PARKING’ RESTRICTIONS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended that the conversion of ‘No Parking’ restrictions on the southern side of Hyland Road, Greystanes to ‘No Parking; 4:00PM – 7:00AM MON-FRI 4:00PM- 12:00 MIDNIGHT SAT 24 HOURS SUNDAY’ in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-223 - AURELIA STREET, TOONGABBIE – APPLICATION FOR ‘WORKS ZONE’ SIGNAGE

Recommendation

The Cumberland Traffic Committee recommended that:

1.      The 18m long ‘Works Zone, 7:00am-6:00pm, Monday-Friday, 8:00am-4:00pm, Saturday’ signs be installed on the frontage of the development site on Aurelia Street, Toongabbie subject to Council’s standard conditions for the period of 10 months and subsequent extension if required.

2.      The applicant be advised to pay the ‘Works Zone’ fees to Council as per the adopted Fees and Charges.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-224 - HYACINTH STREET, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs at the front of 15 Hyacinth Street, Greystanes in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The costs associated with the installation and ongoing maintenance of the signs shall be borne by the owner of of 15 Hyacinth Street, Greystanes at no cost to Council.

3.      The applicant be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-225 - CUTCLIFFE AVENUE AND JOSEPH STREET, REGENTS PARK – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND CENTRE LINE MARKING

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ zones and centre line marking on Cutcliffe Avenue at its intersection with Joseph Street, Regents Park in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

Discussion:

Transport for NSW representative recommended to install ‘BB’ lines instead of ‘S1’ line at the intersection of Cutcliffe Avenue and Joseph Street, Regents Park to enhance drivers’ consciousness of the traffic directions and standardise their driving behaviours.

Action:

Amended plan attached.

 

 

 

 

Superseded Plan

Amended Plan

 

ITEM CTC-21-226 - FREDERICK AVENUE AND LAVINIA STREET, SOUTH GRANVILLE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs at the intersection of Frederick Avenue and Lavinia Street, South Granville in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-227 - WOODPARK ROAD, SMITHFIELD – REQUEST FOR 1/2 HOUR PARKING RESTRICTIONS.

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘1/2 hour, 5am – 4pm, Mon – Fri’ in front of 115 Woodpark Road, Smithfield in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The adjacent businesses be notified of the outcome generally.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-228 - MCFARLANE STREET, MERRYLANDS– CHANGES TO EXISTING PARKING RESTRICTIONS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended the changes to the existing parking arrangement on McFarlane Street, Merrylands in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-229 - NORTHCOTE STREET, AUBURN – REQUEST FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING

Recommendation

That the Traffic Committee recommended that the request for accessible parking at the frontage of a property in Northcote Street, Auburn not be approved.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-230 - BANDO ROAD, GIRRAWEEN –PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTION OF EXISTING RAISED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended that

1.      The proposed conversion of the existing raised asphalt crossing on Bando Road east of Carinya Street, Girraween outside Girraween Public School to a raised concrete pedestrian crossing in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The final design plans be forwarded to Transport for NSW

3.      The adjacent residents be notified prior to construction.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-231 - BATHURST STREET, GREYTANES - PROPOSED RELOCATION AND RAISING OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended that

1.      The proposed relocation and conversion of the existing at-level pedestrian crossing on Bathurst Street at Beresford Road, Greystanes to a raised pedestrian crossing with road narrowing in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The final design plans be forwarded to Transport for NSW.

3.      The adjacent residents be notified of the proposal.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-232 - BRAESIDE ROAD, GREYTANES - PROPOSED RAISING OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed conversion of the existing at-level pedestrian crossing on Braeside Road, Greystanes to a raised pedestrian crossing with road narrowing and kerb blisters in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The final design plans be forwarded to Transport for NSW.

3.      The school be notified of the proposal.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-233 - FAIRFIELD ROAD, GUILDFORD WEST–PROPOSED RAISED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended that

1.      The proposed conversion of the existing at-level pedestrian crossing on Fairfield Road north of Edward Street, Guildford West to a raised concrete pedestrian crossing in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The final design plans be forwarded to Transport for NSW.

3.      The adjacent residents be notified of the proposal.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-234 - HILLTOP ROAD, MERRYLANDS  – PROPOSED RAISED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed conversion of the existing at-level pedestrian crossing on Hilltop Road, Merrylands to a raised pedestrian crossing in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The final design plans be forwarded to Transport for NSW

3.      The adjacent residents be notified of the proposal.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-235 - RINGROSE AVENUE, GREYTANES - PROPOSED RAISING OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING – FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STIMULUS PROGRAM - ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended that

1.      The proposed relocation and conversion of the existing at-level pedestrian crossing on Ringrose Avenue, Greystanes to a raised pedestrian crossing with road narrowing in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      The final design plans be forwarded to Transport for NSW.

3.      The adjacent residents be notified of the proposal.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-236 - TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE FOR ‘AUSTRALIA DAY’ CELEBRATIONS

Recommendation

That the Traffic Committee recommended that the temporary two hour closure of Pitt Street in accordance with the attached traffic control plan between 8:30PM and 10:30PM on Wednesday January 26, 2022 be approved subject to concurrence and approval of a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) by Transport for NSW.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-237 - CARDIGAN STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended the installation of traffic calming devices on Cardigan Street, Guildford not be supported

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-238 - GRANVILLE RAILWAY DISASTER MEMORIAL – PROPOSED TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE OF CARLTON STREET, GRANVILLE

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      Council approves the temporary full road closure of Carlton Street, Granville between Railway Parade and Council car park entry adjacent to Russell Street from 5:00 AM to 1:00PM on Tuesday 18 January 2022 subject to approval from Transport for NSW for the Traffic Management and Traffic Control Plans.

2.      The Traffic Management and Traffic Control Plans be forwarded to City of Parramatta for concurrence.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-239 - GUILDFORD ROAD AND ROBERTSON STREET, GUILDFORD –INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROVISION OF A ROUNDABOUT

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The request for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Guildford Road and Robertson Street be supported in principle.

 

2.      Council prepare a Traffic Management Plan and submit to transport for NSW for approval and report to traffic committee.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-240 - RUTH STREET, MERRYLANDS WEST– REQUEST FOR BANNING OF RIGHT TURNS INTO THE STREET

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The information contained in this report be noted.

2.      Council undertake consultation with the residents of Ruth Street, Merrylands and report back with consultation results.

 

 

ITEM CTC-21-241 - TERRY STREET, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED SPEED HUMPS

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommended:

1.      The proposed installation of speed humps on Terry Street, Greystanes in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

2.      Council undertake consultation with directly affected residents and report back to traffic committee if objections are received.

     

General Business

The following general business was raised:

Next Meeting

Next Meeting to be held Wednesday, 2 February 2022. 

Meeting Close

The meeting terminated at:  N/A

Signed:

Chairperson

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-001

CHISWICK ROAD, AUBURN AT HARROW ROAD– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a resident requesting for parking restrictions in Chiswick Road, Auburn at both intersections of Harrow Road.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

 

1.   The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs and line marking in Chiswick Road and Harrow Road, Auburn at their intersections in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

2.   The affected residents be notified of the outcome.

 

 

Report

Chiswick Road is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h. It has a width of approximately 12.5m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Harrow Road is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a speed limit of 50 km/h. it has a width of approximately 12.5m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Chiswick Road and Harrow Road form T-junctions with priority by default to Chiswick Road. No ‘Give Way’ signs provided in Harrow Road at both intersections (Figure 1). 

 

Council has received a request from a resident requesting for parking restrictions in Chiswick Road, Auburn at both intersections of Harrow Road.

 

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

A review of the Centre for Road Safety accident data indicates that there was no recorded accident at the intersections of Chiswick Road and Harrow Road in the last five years ending in March 2021.

 

A site inspection indicated that vehicles are parking within 10 metres at both intersections. The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs would strengthen the Road Rules requirements and stop vehicles from parking too close to the intersections. It would also improve sight distance requirements.

 

Also, it is proposed to install ‘BB’ centre lines on the Harrow Road approaches and Chiswick Road to assist turning vehicles.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Chiswick Road at Harrow Road, Auburn – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ parking restrictions.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-002

CHURCH STREET, LIDCOMBE– PROPOSED ‘LEFT TURN ONLY’ SIGN

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    T-28-01/06

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a resident requesting for the installation of a ‘Left Turn Only’ sign in Church Street, Lidcombe at the overpass bridge near Lidcombe Railway Station.

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the installation of a ‘Left Turn Only’ sign in Church Street, Lidcombe near the overpass bridge in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

Report

Church Street runs in an east-west direction between Olympic Drive and Bachell Avenue and is a regional road with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h near the Lidcombe Town centre and 60km/hr after the town centre.

 

Railway Street between Mark Street and East Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/h.

 

Church Street and Railway Street connects via a bridge over the railway line near Lidcombe Railway Station. Left and right turn restrictions exist on both directions at this section of Church Street and Railway Street as shown in figure 1 below.

 

Currently, pavement arrows are painted on Church Street and Railway Street near the overpass bridge, ‘Left and Right Turn Only’ signs are also installed on both sides of Railway Street and a ‘Right Turn Only’ sign is installed on the western side of Church Street near the bridge. No signage was found on the eastern side of Church Street approaching to the bridge (Figure 2).

 

Due to the high volume of traffic using this bridge connecting sections of Lidcombe north and south of the railway line during peak hours, it is alleged that the ‘Left Turn Only’ pavement arrows on Church Street near the bridge are not visible as they are often covered by the traffic.  It is also alleged that vehicles sometimes attempt to go straight from the eastern approach of Church Street causing near misses.

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

Figure 2 – Existing signage and line marking

 

A review of the Centre for Road Safety accident database indicates that there was one (1) recorded head on accident in Church Street at the overpass bridge in the last five years ending in March 2021.

To improve the safety at this intersection, it is proposed that a ‘Left Turn Only’ sign be installed on the southern side of Church Street, Lidcombe east of the overpass bridge as shown in attached plan.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Church Street, Lidcombe – Proposed ‘Left Turn Only’ sign.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-003

EXCELSIOR STREET AND BESZANT STREET, MERRYLANDS– PROPOSED EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a resident requesting for the extension of the existing ‘No Stopping’ restrictions outside his property.

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends that the relocation of the existing ‘No Stopping’ sign on the western side of Excelsior Street at the north western corner of its intersection with Beszant Street by approximatively 4m north in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

Report

The Cumberland Traffic Committee, at its meeting of 25 February 2021, considered a report relating to the traffic conditions at the intersection of Excelsior Street and Beszant Street, Merrylands. The Committee recommended and Council subsequently resolved that “No Stopping” signs be installed at 10 metres at the intersection as shown in the Figure 1 below.

 

After the installation of the “No Stopping” signs, a representation was received from the resident of No.30 Excelsior Street requesting the relocation of the ‘No Stopping’ sign outside his property.

 

The resident clamied that the distance between the ‘No Stopping’ sign and his driveway is approxiamtely 5m and vehicles often park in this area. As a result, the sight distance for the resident at his drvieway is serverly restricted by the pakred vehicles. The resident also stated that vehicels regularly park partially across his driveway due to the short length between the signage and his driveway.

Figure 1 – Approved No Stopping signs

 

Investigation found that the distance between the ‘No Stopping’ sign and the driveway of No.30 Excelsior Street is not sufficient to park a vehicle without overhanging the adjacent driveway.

 

To improve the safety at this location, it is proposed to extend the existing ‘No Stopping’ sign outside No.30 Excelsior Street approximately 4m north as per the attached plan.

No consultation is required as the request was made by the resident of No.30 Excelsior Street and no other property frontage will be impacted by the relocation of the ‘No Stopping’ sign.

No Stopping
 


Attachments

1.      Plan – Excelsior Street and Beszant Street, Merrylands – Proposed relocation of the existing ‘No Stopping’ sign.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-004

FOWLER ROAD, MERRYLANDS AT THE INTERSETION OF WARIALDA STREET– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a resident requesting installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs in Fowler Road at the intersection of Warialda Street, Merrylands.

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

 

1.   The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs and ‘BB’ centre line at the intersection of Fowler Road and Warialda Street, Merrylands in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)           

2.   The affected residents be notified of the outcome.

 

 

Report

Fowler Road is classified as a regional road that runs in a north-south direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h. It has a width of approximately 12.5m. A refuge island is provided in Fowler Road approximately 25m north from Warialda Street. ‘No Stopping’ restrictions associated with the refuge island exist in Fowler Road. Parking is permitted on other sections of Fowler Road at this intersection.

 

Warialda Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h. it has a width of approximately 10.5 m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Fowler Road and Warialda Street form a T-junction with priority to Fowler Road. ‘Give Way’ signs and line marking exist in Warialda Street at the intersection of Fowler Road. A bus stop also exists outside No.34 Fowler Street as shown in Figure 1 below. 

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

A review of Centre for Road Safety accident data indicates that there were no reported accidents at the intersection of Fowler Road and Warialda Street in the last five years ending in March 2021.

 

A site inspection indicated that vehicles are parking within 10 metres from the intersection. The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs would strengthen the Road Rules requirements and stop vehicles from parking too close to the intersection. It would also improve sight distance requirements.

 

To provide better delineation for the motorists in Fowler Road at this intersection, it is suggested to remove the existing Separation (S1) line marking in Fowler Road between Warialda Street and Desmond Street and provide ‘BB’ centre line marking at this section of Fowler Road. As the width of this section of Fowler Street is more than 12m, no on-street parking spaces will be affected by the proposed ‘BB’ line marking. 

It is proposed to provide ‘No Stopping’ signs and ‘BB’ centre line marking at the intersection as per the attached plan.

Attachments

1.      Plan - Fowler Road at the intersection of Warialda Street, Merrylands – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ parking restrictions with ‘BB’ centre line marking.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-005

TOONGABBIE ROAD, TOONGABBIE – PROPOSED PART-TIME SCHOOL BUS ZONE SIGNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from CDC bus operator for the installation of part-time School Bus Zone signs outside No.125 Toongabbie Road, Toongabbie.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the installation of ‘Bus Zone (7:30am-9:00am; 2:30pm-4:00pm; School Days)’ signs outside No.125 Toongabbie Road, Toongabbie in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

Report

Toongabbie Road between the Great Western Highway and Portia Road is a regional road that runs in a north-south direction. It has a width of approximately 12.5m. The posted speed limit is 60km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Council has received a request from CDC bus operator for the installation of part-time ‘Bus Zone’ signs outside No.125 Toongabbie Road.

 

CDC bus provides a school bus service to pick up and drop off school students in Toongabbie Road. However, no formal signage was installed in the street.

 

Due to the increased requests from the parents, CDC bus operator has requested that a formal bus zone at this location is needed to ensure that buses are able to stop at the kerb safely to allow passengers to board and alight. It is requested by the CDC bus operator that the bus zone at this location could be part-time bus zone during school days outside No.125 Toongabbie Road.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The map below shows locality of Toongabbie Road, Toongabbie:

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

It is recommended to install “Bus Zone; 7:30am-9:00am; 2:30pm-4:00pm; School Days” signs outside Nos. 125 Toongabbie Road. The bus company will install a bus stop sign with school bus times at this location. The property, 125 Toongabbie Road is owned by Cumberland City Council.

No consultation is required as the proposed bus zone location is at the frontage of a Council reserve.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Toongabbie Road, Toongabbie – Proposed ‘Bus Zone’   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-006

WHALANS ROAD AND LAWRY STREET, GREYSTANES – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident to improve road safety at the intersection of Whalans Road and Lawry Street, Greystanes.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs and BB line marking at the intersection of Whalans Road and Lawry Street, Greystanes in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.      The affected residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

Report

Whalans Road is a local road that runs in an east-west direction, it has a width of approximately 10.6m and parking permitted on both sides of the road.

 

Whalans Road has centre line and edge lines marked.

 

Lawry Street is a local road that runs in a north-south direction and has a width of approximately 7.5m at the intersection and parking is permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules.

 

Whalans Road and Lawry Street form a T-junction with priority control (by default) to Whalans Road. The intersection is near the reserve and Golf course on Whalans Road.

 

 

 

 

The map below shows the intersection of Whalans Road and Lawry Street.

 

 

Council has received a request from a local resident to improve road safety and install a roundabout at the intersection of Whalans Road and Lawry Street.

 

The resident has alleged that heavy traffic on Whalans Road makes it difficult to exit out of Lawry Street. Also, it is alleged that vehicles park too close to the intersection.

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and found that based on the latest crash data, there were no reported crashes related to intersection crashes at this intersection.

 

Council officers have also investigated the request for a roundabout. Council’s investigation revealed that a roundabout cannot be provided at this intersection in accordance with the current standards and guidelines.

 

Further investigation revealed that there are no ‘No Stopping’ signs at this intersection and if vehicle/s park too close to the intersection then the sight distance would be restricted.

 

The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs would strengthen the Road Rules requirement and stop vehicles from parking too close to the intersection and would improve safety for all road users. In addition, the installation of ‘BB’ centre line marking on Lawry Street will assist to keep traffic flow on the left-hand side of the travelling lane.

 

The ‘No Stopping’ signs on the Lawry Street approach are installed at 13m. This will assist traffic to pass a parked vehicle without crossing the 10m ‘BB’ centre line in the narrow street. The ‘No stopping’ signs on Whalans Road are installed to match the existing edge line marking.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Whalans Road and Lawry Street, Greystanes – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ parking restriction and BB line marking.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-007

CLUCAS ROAD AND AMY STREET, REGENTS PARK – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at the intersection of Clucas Road and Amy Street, Regents Park.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ zones at the intersection of Clucas Road and Amy Street, Regents Park in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

Report

Amy Street is a regional road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/hr. it has a width of approximately 12.6m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Amy Street has ‘BB’ centre lines and edge lines marked.

 

Clucas Road is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 7m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules unless signposted.

 

Amy Street and Clucas Road form a T-junction intersection with priority to Amy Street (by default).

 

The latest accident data at this intersection indicated that there were no reported crashes at this intersection in the last 5 years.

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at this intersection. The resident has alleged that vehicles park very close to the intersection and restrict traffic flow.

 

The map below shows the intersection of Amy Street and Clucas Road, Regents Park.

 

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and found that there are no ‘No Stopping’ signs at this intersection. The traffic flow would be restricted if vehicles park too close to the intersection. Also, any parked vehicle close to the intersection will cause safety issues for vehicles exiting from Clucas Road into the regional road.

 

The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs would strengthen the Road Rules requirement, stop vehicles from parking too close to the intersection and would improve safety for all road users. In addition, the installation of ‘BB’ centre line marking on Clucas Road will assist to keep traffic flow on the left-hand side of the travelling lane.

 

The ‘No Stopping’ signs on the Clucas Road approach are installed at 13m. This will assist traffic to pass a parked vehicle without crossing the 10m ‘BB’ centre line in the narrow street.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Amy Street and Clucas Road, Regents Park – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ signs   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-008

FRANCES STREET AND BENSON STREET, SOUTH WENTWORTHVILLE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at the intersection of Frances Street and Benson Street, South Wentworthville.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ zones and ‘BB’ line marking at the intersection of Frances Street and Benson Street, South Wentworthville in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

Report

Frances Street is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 12m and parking permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Benson Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 7.3m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules unless signposted. Benson Street forms the northern boundary of Pitt Park.

 

Frances Street and Benson Street form a T-junction intersection with priority control Frances Street (by default).

 

The latest accident data at this intersection indicated that there were no reported accidents at this intersection in the last 5 years.

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at this intersection. The resident has alleged that vehicles park very close to the intersection and restrict traffic flow and compromise safety of all road users including park users.

 

The map below shows the intersection of Frances Street and Benson Street.

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and found that there are no ‘No Stopping’ signs installed at this intersection. The traffic flow would be restricted if vehicles park too close to the intersection especially in the narrow Benson Street.

 

Therefore, the installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs and ‘BB’ centre line marking at the intersection would improve road safety for all road users at this intersection.

The ‘No Stopping’ signs on the Benson Street approach are installed at 13m. This will assist traffic to pass a parked vehicle without crossing the 10m ‘BB’ centre line in the narrow street.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Frances Street and Benson Street, South Wentworthville – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ signs and installation of BB line marking.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-009

OCTAVIA STREET AND AURELIA STREET, TOONGABBIE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINE MARKING

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at the intersection of Octavia Street and Aurelia Street, Toongabbie.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ zones and ‘BB’ line marking at the intersection of Octavia Street and Aurelia Street, Toongabbie in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

Report

Ocatvia Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 12.8m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules unless signposted.

 

Aurelia Street is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 12.6m and parking permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules unless signposted.

 

Octavia Street and Aurelia Street form a T-junction intersection with priority to Octavia Street (by default). 

 

The latest accident data at this intersection indicated that there was one reported accident at this intersection in the last 5 years.

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at this intersection. The resident has alleged that vehicles park very close to the intersection and restrict traffic flow.

 

The map below shows the intersection of Octavia Street and Aurelia Street.

 

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and found that there are ‘No Stopping’ signs on Aurelia Street but there are no ‘No Stopping’ signs on Octavia Street.

 

The traffic flow would be restricted if vehicles park too close to the intersection particularly on Ocatvia Street.

 

Therefore, the installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs on Octavia Street at the intersection with Aurelia Street would improve safety of all road users. In addition, it is proposed to install ‘BB’ centre line marking in Aurelia Street and Octavia Street to keep traffic flow on the left-hand side of the centre lines.

 

The proposed intersection treatment would improve road safety for all road users at this intersection

Attachments

1.      Plan – Ocatvia Street and Aurelia Street, Toongabbie – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ signs and installation of BB line marking.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-010

OCTAVIA STREET AND TOONGABBIE ROAD, TOONGABBIE – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at the intersection of Octavia Street and Toongabbie, Toongabbie.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ zones and ‘BB’ line marking at the intersection of Octavia Street and Toongabbie Road, Toongabbie in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

Report

Octavia Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 12.8m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules unless signposted.

 

Toongabbie Road section at Octavia Street is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/hr at this section of road. It has a width of approximately 12.2m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Octavia Street and Toongabbie Road form a T-junction intersection with priority to Toongabbie Road (by default).

 

The latest accident data at this intersection indicated that there were two reported accidents at this intersection in the last 5 years.

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at this intersection. The resident has alleged that vehicles park very close to the intersection and restrict traffic flow.

 

The map below shows the intersection of Octavia Street and Toongabbie Road.

 

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and found that there were ‘No Stopping’ signs on Toongabbie Road but the signs were missed during the recent constructions nearby and there are no ‘No Stopping’ signs on Octavia Street.

 

The traffic flow would be restricted if vehicles park too close to the intersection.

There is a pedestrian refuge on Toongabbie Road south of Octavia Street. The statutory ‘No Stopping’ signs at the refuge have not been installed and or missing.

 

Therefore, the installation of missing and new ‘No Stopping’ signs at the intersection would improve safety of all road users. In addition, it is recommended to install ‘BB’ centre line marking in Octavia Street to keep traffic flow on the left-hand side of the travelling lane.

The proposed intersection treatment would improve road safety for all road users at this intersection

Attachments

1.      Plan – Ocatvia Street and Toongabbie Road, Toongabbie – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ signs and installation of BB line marking.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-011

WARWICK ROAD AND LEEDS STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at the intersection of Warwick Road and Leeds Street, Merrylands.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs and ‘BB’ line marking at the intersection of Warwick Road and Leeds Street, Merrylands in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally.

 

Report

Warwick Road is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 10.5m and parking permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules unless signposted.

 

Leeds Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 10.5m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules unless signposted.

 

Warwick Road and Leeds Street form a cross junction intersection with priority control on Warwick Road and ‘Give-Way’ signs on Leeds Street.

 

The latest accident data at this intersection indicated that there were three reported accidents at this intersection in the last 5 years.

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at this intersection. The resident has alleged that vehicles speeding at the intersection and stopping at existing ‘Give-Way’ signs.

 

The map below shows the intersection of Warwick Road and Leeds Street.

 

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and found that there are no ‘No Stopping’ signs installed at this intersection.

 

Therefore, it is proposed to the install statutory 10m ‘No Stopping’ zones at this intersection to strengthen the Road Rules requirement and improve sight distance.

 It is also proposed to install ‘BB’ centre lines at the intersection to keep traffic flows on the left-hand side of the travelling lane.

 

The proposed intersection treatment would improve road safety for all road users at this intersection.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Warwick Road and Leeds Street, Merrylands – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ signs and BB line marking.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-012

ELIZABETH STREET, GUILDFORD AT THE INTERSETION OF CECIL STREET– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS AND LINE MARKING

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

 

Council has received concerns from a resident requesting for intersection treatment at the intersection of Elizabeth Street and Cecil Street, Guildford. The resident has alleged that vehicles exiting from Cecil Street fail to give way at this intersection.

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

 

1.   The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs and ‘BB’ centre line at the intersection of Elizabeth Street and Cecil Street, Guildford in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.   The affected residents be notified of the outcome.

 

 

Report

 

Elizabeth Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/h. It has a width of approximately 12m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Cecil Street is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a speed limit of 50 km/h. it has a width of approximately 12m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Elizabeth Street and Cecil Street form a T-junction with priority to Elizabeth Street. The intersection does not have any ‘Give Way’ signs installed; however, default priority applies here with Elizabeth Street having priority.

 

The map below shows the intersection.

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

A review of the available accident data indicated that there was one (1) recorded accident at the intersection of Elizabeth Street and Cecil Street in the last five years ending in March 2021.

 

The intersection satisfies the sight distance requirements and due to low crash record, any intersection control sign such as ‘Give Way’ or ‘Stop’ is not warranted. The T-intersection rule applies. It is proposed to install ‘BB’ centre lines on Cecil Street and Elizabeth Street which will assist to bring awareness of the intersection.

 

A site inspection indicated that vehicles are parking within 10 metres from the intersection. The installation of 10m ‘No Stopping’ signs would strengthen the Road Rules requirements and stop vehicles from parking too close to the intersection.

Therefore, it is proposed to provide ‘No Stopping’ signs and ‘BB’ centre line marking at the intersection as per attached plan.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Elizabeth Street at the intersection of Cecil Street Guildford –Proposed ‘No Stopping’ parking restrictions and ‘BB’ centre line marking.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-013

ELIZABETH STREET, GUILDFORD AT THE INTERSETION OF O’NEILL STREET – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

 

Council has received concerns from a resident requesting for intersection treatment at the intersection of Elizabeth Street and O’Neil Street, Guildford. The resident has alleged that vehicles exiting from O’Neil Street fail to give way at this intersection.

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

 

1.   The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs at the intersection of Elizabeth Street and O’Neill Street in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.   The affected residents be notified of the outcome.

 

 

Report

 

Elizabeth Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h. It has a width of approximately 12m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

O’Neill Street is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a speed limit of 50 km/h and it has a width of approximately 12m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Elizabeth Street and O’Neill Street form staggered intersection with priority to Elizabeth Street. ‘Give Way’ signs and line marking are provided on O’Neill Street (Figure 1). 

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

A review of the Centre for Road Safety Accident database indicated that there were no reported accidents at the intersection of Elizabeth Street and O’Neill Street in the last five years ending March 2021.

 

Site observations indicated that vehicles occasionally park close to the intersection. It is proposed to install “No Stopping’ signs at the intersection. The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs would strengthen the Road Rules requirements and stop vehicles from parking too close to the intersection. It would also improve sight distance requirements.

 

The attached plan shows details of the proposal.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Elizabeth Street, Guildford at the intersetion of O’Neill Street – proposed intersection treatment.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-014

PENDLE WAY, PENDLE HILL – RELOCATE EXISTING  PEAK PERIOD ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGN

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-03-21

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the relocation of the existing peak period ‘No Stopping, 6:30am – 9:30am and 3:30pm – 6:30pm’ located in front of 11 Pendle Way, Pendle Hill.

This report outlines the outcome of a review into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the proposed relocation of existing ‘No Stopping, 6:30am – 9:30am and 3:30pm – 6:30pm’ sign located in front of 11 Pendle Way, Pendle Hill in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

Report

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the for the relocation of existing peak period ‘No Stopping, 6:30am – 9:30am & 3:30pm – 6:30pm’ located in front of 11 Pendle Way, Pendle Hill.

 

The resident has alleged that vehicles park very close to the driveway (between driveway and ‘No Stopping’ sign outside peak period) and restrict sight distance. This is due to the unrestricted parking area is already parked up to the sign. The sign is on the eastern side of Pendle Way on the approach to the signalised intersection of Great Western Highway and Pendle Way.

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and found that the existing peak period ‘No Stopping’ sign is located 2.5m from the driveway. If a vehicle parked within this gap between driveway and ‘No Stopping’ sign, then the driveway will be blocked. There is also full time ‘No Stopping’ sign near the signalised intersection.

The increased peak period ‘No Stopping’ zone on the signalised approach would help the operation of the traffic signals and will not have any adverse impact.        

Therefore, to resolve illegal parking issue, it is proposed to relocate existing part time ‘No Stopping, 6:30am – 9:30am & 3:30pm – 6:30pm’ sign by 9m to the north from the current location (i.e., at the property boundary line between number 11 and 13 Pendle Way, Pendle Hill).

No consultation is required since the request was made by the adjacent property owner.

Attachments

1.      Plans – Pendle Way, Pendle Hill – Proposed relocation of traffic sign.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-015

VAUGHAN STREET AND AUBURN ROAD, AUBURN – PROPOSED INTERSECTION TREATMENT

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

 

Council has received a request from a resident requesting for improving safety at the intersection of Vaughan Street and Auburn Road, Auburn.

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

 

1.   The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs at the intersection of Vaughan Street and Auburn Road, Auburn in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.   The installation of ‘Stop Ahead’ warning signs in Auburn Road near the intersection of Vaughan Street in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

ii)         

3.   The affected residents be notified of the outcome.

 

 

Report

 

Vaughan Street is a classified regional road that runs in an east-west direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h. This section of Vaughan Street has a width of approximately 12.5m with edge lines and centre line marking. Parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Auburn Road is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h. it has a width of approximately 12.5m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

 

Vaughan Street and Auburn Road form an intersection with priority to Vaughan Street. Stop signs and line marking with raised thresholds and kerb blister islands exist in Auburn Road at the intersection of Vaughan Street. A refuge island also exists in Vaughan Street east of Auburn Road (Figure 1). 

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

A review of the recent accident data indicates that there were six (6) recorded accidents (2 Non-Casualty and 4 Injured accidents) at the intersection of Vaughan Street and Auburn Road in the last five years (2016-2021) ending in March 2021.

 

A review of the sight distance at this intersection found that when vehicles are parked within 10 metres from the intersection, the sight distance for motorists turning from Auburn Road into Vaughan Street is restricted. 

 

There was a recent accident at this intersection which necessitated an investigation into the safety of this intersection.

 

Site inspection indicated that there are no ‘No Stopping’ signs at this intersection, however, the edge line marking defined the extent of parking.

 

It is proposed to provide ‘No Stopping’ signs at this intersection as per the attached plan. The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs would strengthen the Road Rules requirements and stop vehicles from parking too close to the intersection. It would also improve sight distance requirements. The ‘No Stopping’ signs on Vaughan Street are proposed at 14m to match the existing edge line marking.

In order to improve safety, it is proposed to install a ‘Stop Ahead’ warning sign on both approaches of Auburn Road approaching to the intersection as per the attached plan.

 

The resident also suggested that vehicles in Auburn Road failed to stop and give way to the traffic in Aburn Road and requested No Right Turn restrictions at this intersection.

 

The request of No Right Turn restrictions cannot be supported as it will transfer the issue to the next intersection and will have a significant impact on Council’s local road network and residents.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Vaughan Street at Auburn Road, Auburn – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ parking restrictions and ‘Stop Ahead’ warning sign.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-016

HOLDSWORTH STREET, MERRYLANDS AT PRICE STREET– ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received safety concerns from a local resident at the intersection of Holdsworth Street and Price Street, Merrylands.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.   The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs and ‘BB’ centre line at the intersection of Holdsworth Street and Price Street, Merrylands in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.   The affected residents be notified of the outcome.

 

Report

Council has received safety concerns from a local resident at the intersection of Holdsworth Street and Price Street, Merrylands.

Holdsworth Street is a local road runs in a north-south direction between Merrylands Road and Matthew Street. The road is approximately 780m long and 10.2m wide. The street has a default speed limit of 50km/h. Parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

Price Street is a local road runs in an east-west direction between Fowler Road and Chetwynd Road. The road is approximately 370m long and 10.3m wide. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

Holdsworth Street and Price Street form an intersection with priority to Price Street. ‘Give Way’ signs and line marking exist in Holdsworth Street at the intersection.

 

 

 

The map below shows the location of the intersection.

 

 

Traffic counts were undertaken on Holdsworth Street approximately 20m south of Price Street and on Price Street approximately 35m East of Holdsworth Street in November 2021.

 

The results of the traffic counts indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Holdsworth Street:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 437 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = of 43 km/h

Average Peak Hour Traffic          = AM – 49 Veh/hr & PM – 46 Veh/hr

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 37 km/h

 

Traffic count Data on Price Street:

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 1,743 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = of 53 km/h

Average Peak Hour Traffic          = AM – 157 Veh/hr & PM – 149 Veh/hr

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 46 km/h

 

The traffic count indicated that the recorded 85th percentile speeds on the approaches to the intersection were 43km/h and 53 km/hr. Particularly the approach speed on Holdsworth Street approaching ‘Give way’ control at Price Street is 43 km/hr which is significantly lower than the speed limit of 50km/hr.

 

The peak hour traffic volumes from the traffic count data show that they are not significantly high and gaps will be available in Price Street traffic to allow Holdsworth Street traffic to enter the intersection. A peak hour traffic volume of 157 vehicles indicates that on average less than 3 vehicles pass the intersection (in both directions) every minute.

 

A review of the Centre for Road Safety Accident database indicated that there were six (6) reported accidents at this intersection in the last five years ending in June 2021.

Due to the large number of reported accidents, Council staff have nominated this location for funding for improvements under the Safer Roads Program. 

 

In the interim, it is proposed to provide ‘No Stopping’ signs and 20m ‘BB’ centre line marking at the intersection to improve safety as per the attached plan.

Attachments

1.      1.      Plan – Holdsworth Street, Merrylands at Price Street –Proposed ‘No Stopping’ parking restrictions with ‘BB’ centre line marking.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-017

BERITH ROAD, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Berith Road, Greystanes due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Cumberland Traffic Committee recommends the installation of traffic calming devices on Berith Road, Greystanes not be supported.

 

Report

Council has received a request from residents for the installation of traffic calming devices on Berith Road, Greystanes due to speeding concerns.

Berith Road is a local road runs in a north-south direction between M4 and Old Prospect Road. The end near M4 Motorway is a cul-de-sac end. The road is approximately 310m long and 9.5m wide. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident database indicated that there were no reported accidents in the 5 years up to June 2021 in Berith Road.

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request for the installation of traffic calming devices on Berith Road in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The map below shows the location of Berith Road.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Berith Road in November 2021. The approximate location of the traffic count is shown in red in the map above.

 

The results of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Berith Road:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 459 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = of 53.8 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 44.5 km/h

 

The results of the traffic counts, recorded crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Berith Road in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy.

 

 

 

 

 

The LATM assessments are summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Berith Road - LATM Assessment Points

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

0

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

10

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

15

 

 

Table 2 – Berith Road – Action

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

The traffic count indicated that the recorded 85th percentile speed was 53.8km/h which is within acceptable limits.

Based on the above assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in Berith Road, Greystanes.

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-018

BRADMAN STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Bradman Street, Merrylands due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Cumberland Traffic Committee recommends the installation of traffic calming devices on Bradman Street, Merrylands not be supported.

 

Report

Council has received a request from residents for the installation of traffic calming devices on Bradman Street, Merrylands due to speeding concerns.

Bradman Street is a local road runs in an east-west direction between Woodville Road and Excelsior Street. The road is approximately 370m long and 12.5m wide. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request for the installation of traffic calming devices on Bradman Street in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data indicated that there were no reported accidents in Bradman Street in the 5 years up to June 2021.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The map below shows the location of Bradman Street.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Bradman Street in November 2021. The traffic count location is shown in red on the map above.

 

The results of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Bradman Street:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 571 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = of 55 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 46 km/h

 

The results of the traffic counts, recorded crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Bradman Street  in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy.

 

The LATM assessments are summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Bradman Street - LATM Assessment Points

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

10

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

8

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

23

 

Table 2 – Bradman Street – Action

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

The traffic count indicated that the recorded 85th percentile speed was 55km/h which is within acceptable limits.

 

Based on the above assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in Bradman Street, Merrylands.

 

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-019

WARATAH STREET, GRANVILLE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Waratah Street, Granville due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Cumberland Traffic Committee recommends the installation of traffic calming devices on Waratah Street, Granville not be supported.

 

Report

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Waratah Street, Granville due to speeding concerns.

Waratah Street is a local road running in a north-south direction between Union Street and Randle Street. The road is approximately 190m long and 9.5m wide. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data indicated that there were no reported accidents on Waratah Street in the 5 years up to June 2021.

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request for the installation of traffic calming devices on Waratah Street in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The map below shows the location of Waratah Street, Granville.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken at the middle of Waratah Street in December 2021. The traffic count location is marked in red in the map above.

 

The results of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Waratah Street:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 262 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = of 47.7 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 37 km/h

 

The results of the traffic counts, recorded crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Waratah Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy.

 

The LATM assessments are summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Waratah Street - LATM Assessment Points

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

0

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

9

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

14

 

 

 

Table 2 – Waratah Street – Action

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

The traffic count indicated that the recorded 85th percentile speed was 48km/h which is below the speed limit of the street.

 

Based on the above assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in Waratah Street, Granville.

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-020

BERRY STREET, REGENTS PARK – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Berry Street, Regents Park due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the installation of traffic calming devices on Berry Street, Regents Park not be supported.

 

Report

Berry Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Kingsland Road and Yukka Road. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Berry Street is approximately 275m long and 12.5m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Berry Street due to speeding concerns.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data on Berry Street indicated that there were no reported accidents in the 5 years up to June 2021. 

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The map below shows the location of Berry Street, Regents Park.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Berry Street in November 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Berry St, Regents Park:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 323 vehicles/day

Average Peak Hour traffic: AM 23 veh/hr & PM 36 veh/hr

85th percentile speed = 50.0 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 40.7 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count, reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Berry Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Berry St, Regents Park - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

0

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

12

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

17

 

Table 2 – Berry St, Regents Park - LATM – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 50.0 km/h which is within acceptable limits.

 

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in Berry Street.

 

It was also alleged by the resident that vehicles are using Berry Street as part of a ‘rat-run’ using Yukka Street, Berry Street and Edwin Street to avoid traffic queues in Amy Street. The average daily traffic in Berry Street is 323 Veh/day which is considered low for a local road with over 40 properties. Also the average peak hour traffic in the street is 23 and 36 veh/hr during AM and PM peak hours respectively. It is believed that there is no significant through traffic using Berry Street.

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-021

BURFORD STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

The Cumberland Traffic Committee at its meeting held in February 2021 considered a report on the traffic conditions in Burford Street and recommended that the installation of additional traffic calming devices on Burford Street, Merrylands not be approved, and that Council review conditions in Burford Street and report back to traffic committee in November 2021.

Council approved the above recommendation subsequently.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends that the installation of traffic calming devices on Burford Street, Merrylands is not supported.

 

Report

Burford Street is a local road that runs in a north-south direction between Merrylands Road and St Ann Street. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Burford Street is approximately 420m long and 9.5m wide between Merrylands Road and St Ann Street.

 

There is one roundabout at the intersection of Burford Street and Newman Street which is located approximately mid-block on Burford Street. There is also King Park reserve west of Burford Street at the corner of St Ann Street.

The Cumberland Traffic Committee at its meeting held in February 2021 considered a report on the traffic conditions in Burford Street and recommended:

1.   The installation of additional traffic calming devices on Burford Street, Merrylands is not approved.

2.   Council review conditions in Burford Street and report back to traffic committee in November 2021.

 

The above recommendations were approved by the Council subsequently.

 

Council has reviewed conditions in Burford Street, Merrylands according to the Council resolution.

 

The Centre for Road Safety accident data on Burford Street indicated that there was one reported accident in the 5 years up to June 2021.

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy. The investigation revealed that Burford Street has traffic calming devices such as a roundabout and pedestrian refuge islands.

 

The map below shows the location of Burford Street, Merrylands.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Burford Street in December 2021 between Merrylands Road and Newman Street. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count data on Burford Street, Merrylands together with the data from the previous count is tabulated below:

 

 

December 2020

December 2021

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)

2,407

2,402

85th percentile speed (km/h)

44.3

45.2

Mean (average) vehicle speed (km/h)

34.4

36.4

 

The result of the recent traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Burford Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Burford St between Merrylands Rd & Newman St - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

15

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

5

Road Characteristics

35

18

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

43

 

Table 2 – Burford St between Merrylands Rd & Newman St – LATM Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 45.2 km/h which is well below the speed limit.

 

Based on the LATM assessment and the recorded speeds, no further action is required in Burford Street. Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-022

DAVIDSON STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Davidson Street, Guildford due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the installation of traffic calming devices on Davidson Street, Guildford not be supported.

 

Report

Davidson Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Campbell Hill Road and Dudley Road. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Davidson Road is approximately 300m long and 11.5m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Davidson Street, Guildford due to speeding concerns.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety Accident data on Davidson Road indicated that there were no reported midblock accidents in the 5 years up to June 2021.

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The map below shows the location of Davidson Street, Guildford.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Davidson Street in December 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Davidson Street, Guildford:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 846 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 51.8 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 43.0 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Davidson Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Davidson Street, Guildford - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

5

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

9

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

19

 

Table 2 – Davidson Street, Guildford – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 51.8 km/h which within acceptable limit.

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in Davidson Street.

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-023

EARL STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Earl Street, Merrylands due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.   The installation of traffic calming devices on Earl Street, Merrylands is not supported.

i)                

2.   Council review conditions in Earl Street, Merrylands, and report back to traffic committee in June 2023.

 

Report

Earl Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Woodville Road and Excelsior Street. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Earl Street is approximately 380m long and with varying widths. There are indented parking bays provided along the street. Earl Street is approximately 7m wide where no indented parking is provided.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Earl Street due to speeding concerns.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data on Earl Street indicated that there were no reported accidents in the 5 years up to June 2021.

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

 

 

The map below shows the location of Earl Street, Merrylands.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Earl Street in December 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic Count Data on Earl St, Merrylands:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 1,201 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 52.0 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 42.1 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Earl Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Earl St, Merrylands - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

10

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

14

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 – Earl St, Merrylands – LATM Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 52.0 km/h which is within acceptable limits.

 

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street at this instance. This will be reviewed in 12 months.

 

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-024

EDWIN STREET, REGENTS PARK – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Edwin Street, Regents Park due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the installation of traffic calming devices on Edwin Street, Regents Park not be supported.

 

Report

Edwin Street is a local road that runs in an east-west and north-south direction between Kingsland Road and Amy Street. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Edwin Street is approximately 250m long and 12.5m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Edwin Street due to speeding concerns.

 

The Centre for Road Safety accident data on Edwin Street indicated that there were no reported accidents in the 5 years up to June 2021. 

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The map below shows the location of Edwin Street, Regents Park.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Edwin Street in December 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Edwin St, Regents Park:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)  = 548 vehicles/day

Average Peak hour traffic     = AM 39 veh/hr and PM 59 veh/hr

ADT for eastbound traffic     = 289 veh/day

ADT for westbound traffic    = 259 veh/day

85th percentile speed = 47.7 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 38 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Edwin Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Edwin St, Regents Park - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

5

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

12

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

22

 

Table 2 – Edwin St, Regents Park - LATM – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 47.7 km/h which is below the posted speed limits.

 

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street.

 

It was also alleged by the resident that vehicles are using Edwin Street as part of a ‘rat-run’ using Yukka Street, Berry Street and Kingsland Road to avoid traffic queues in Amy Street. The average daily traffic in Edwin Street is 548 Veh/day with peak hour traffic of 39 veh/hr and 59 veh/hr during AM and PM peak hours respectively which is considered low for a medium density local road with apartments and single dwellings.

 

It is believed that there is no significant through traffic using Edwin Street.

The traffic count results also indicated that the ADT for eastbound and westbound traffic in Edwin Street is very close (289 and 259 vehicles/day). This suggested that there is no significant ‘rat-run’ traffic in Edwin Street,

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-025

HANBURY STREET, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council at its meeting on 17 March 2021 Considered a report (vide C03/21-706 – Item No. CTC-21-031) regarding road safety concerns on Hanbury Street, Greystanes. Council approved Cumberland Traffic Committee recommendation not to support traffic calming devices in Hanbury Street and to review conditions in November 2021.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.   The installation of traffic calming devices on Hanbury Street, Greystanes not be supported.

i)                

2.   Council review conditions in Hanbury Street, Greystanes in June 2023 and report back to traffic committee.

 

Report

 

Cumberland Traffic Committee at its meeting held in February 2021 recommended:

 

1.      The request for traffic calming devices in Hanbury Street, Greystanes not be approved,

2.      Council review conditions in Hanbury Street in November 2021 and report back to traffic committee.

 

Council at its meeting on 17 March 2021 Considered approved the traffic committee’s recommendation.

 

Council’s Officers have reviewed the conditions in Hanbury Street in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The Centre for Road Safety accident data indicates that there were no reported crashes in Hanbury Street in the 5 years up to June 2021.

 

The map below shows the location of Hanbury Street, Greystanes.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Hanbury Street in late December 2021. The location of the traffic count is shown in red in the map above.

 

The results of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Hanbury Street:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 554 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = of 55.6 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 45.5 km/h

 

The above data is provided together with previous counts in tabulated form below:

 

 

August 2018

Nov. 2020

Nov. 2021

Average Daily Traffic (Veh./day)

505

529

554

85th percentile speed (km/hr)

58.7

57.8

55.6

Mean (average) vehicle speed (km/hr)

48.6

47.9

45.5

 

The data above shows that the recorded 85th percentile speed has reduced compared to previous years.

 

The results of the latest traffic counts, recorded crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Hanbury Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy.

 

The LATM assessments are summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Hanbury Street - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

10

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

16

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

31

 

Table 2 – Hanbury Street – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

The recorded 85th percentile speed is 55.6 km/h which is within acceptable limit.

Based on the above assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street.

This will be reviewed in 12 months.Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-026

HARRY AVENUE, LIDCOMBE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Harry Avenue, Lidcombe due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.   The installation of traffic calming devices on Harry Avenue, Lidcombe not be supported.

i)                

2.   Council review traffic conditions in Harry Avenue, Lidcombe in June 2023 and report back to traffic committee.

 

Report

 

Harry Avenue is a local road that runs in a north-south direction. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with the Road Rules unless signposted. Harry Avenue is approximately 570m long and 8.0m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Harry Avenue due to speeding concerns.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data on Harry Avenue indicated that there was one reported accident in the 5 years up to June 2021.

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The map below shows the location of Harry Avenue, Lidcombe.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Harry Avenue in November 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Harry Avenue, Lidcombe:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 599 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 52.2 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 43.0 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Harry Avenue in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Harry Avenue, Lidcombe - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

5

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

5

Road Characteristics

35

15

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

30

 

Table 2 – Harry Avenue, Lidcombe – LATM Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 52.2 km/h which is within acceptable limits.

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street. This will be reviewed in 12 months.Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-027

LACKEY STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lackey Street, Merrylands due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends that;

1.   The installation of traffic calming devices on Lackey Street, Merrylands not be supported.

2.   Council review conditions in Lackey Street, Merrylands and report back to traffic committee in June 2023

 

Report

Lackey Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Woodville Road and Blaxcell Street. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Lackey Street is approximately 1050m long and 12.3m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lackey Street due to speeding concerns.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data on Lackey Street indicated that there was one reported accident in Lackey Street between Robertson Street and Excelsior Street in the 5 years up to June 2021. 

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy. The investigation revealed that Lackey Street have speed humps between Woodville Road and Excelsior Street, also Lackey Street is closed at mid-block between Robertson Street and Blaxcell Street.  A roundabout was constructed at the intersection of Lackey Street and Excelsior Street in 2019.

 

There are no traffic calming devices on Lackey Street between Robertson Street and Excelsior Street. And this investigation considers the section of Lackey Street between Robertson Street and Excelsior Street.

 

 

The map below shows the location of Lackey Street, Merrylands.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Lackey Street in November 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Lackey St between Robertson St & Excelsior St:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 736 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 52.3 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 43 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lackey Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Lackey St between Robertson St & Excelsior St - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

5

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

5

Road Characteristics

35

10

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 – Lackey St between Robertson St & Excelsior St – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 52.3 km/h which is within acceptable limits.

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street.

 

The conditions in Lackey Street will be reviewed  in 12 months.Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-028

LANSDOWNE STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lansdowne Street, Merrylands due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1)       The installation of traffic calming devices on Lansdowne Street, Merrylands not be supported.

i)                

2)       Council review conditions in Lansdowne Street, Merrylands in June 2023 and report back to traffic committee.

 

Report

 

Lansdowne Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Woodville Road and Railway Terrace. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Lansdowne Street is approximately 610m long and 10.7m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lansdowne Street due to speeding concerns.

 

Background:

 

Cumberland Traffic Committee at its meeting held in August 2020 considered a report (CTC-20-132) regarding speeding concerns in Lansdowne Street, Merrylands and recommended that:

 

1.   The request for speed humps in Lansdowne Street, Merrylands not be approved.

2.   Council request Cumberland Police Area Command to undertake random speed surveillance in Lansdowne Street, Merrylands.

 

3.   Council review traffic conditions in Lansdowne Street in July 2021 and report back to Cumberland Traffic Committee if conditions have changed.

 

Council approved the above recommendations.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident database indicated that there were no reported accidents in Lansdowne Street in the 5 years up to June 2021

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy. The investigation revealed that Lansdowne Street has traffic calming devices between Woodville Road and Railway Terrace Street, such as slow points, kerb extension and central median islands.

 

The map below shows the location of Lansdowne Street, Merrylands.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Lansdowne Street in December 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Lansdowne St, Merrylands:

 

The traffic count data from previous and current counts are given below:

 

 

March 2020

December 2021

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)

2,135 veh./day

2,526 veh./day

85th percentile speed

55.4 km/hr

53.1 km/hr

Mean (average) vehicle speed

46.6 km/hr

45.3 km/hr

 

 

 

 

 

The result of the recent traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lansdowne Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Lansdowne St, Merrylands - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

15

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

9

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

29

 

Table 2 – Lansdowne St, Merrylands – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 53.1 km/h which is within acceptable limits. This recorded 85th percentile speed has also reduced since 2020.

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street.

The traffic conditions will be reviewed in 12 months.Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-029

NICHOLAS STREET, LIDCOMBE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Nicholas Street, Lidcombe due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.   The installation of traffic calming devices on Nicholas Street, Lidcombe not be supported.

i)                

2.   Council review conditions in Nicholas Street, Lidcombe in November 2022 and report back to traffic committee.

 

Report

Nicholas Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Harry Avenue and Bachell Avenue. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Nicholas Street has varying widths and the section between Platform Street and Bachell Avenue is approximately 12.3m wide. This section has edge lines and centre lines marked.

 

The section of Nicholas Street between Harry Avenue and Platform Street is narrow and approximately 9m wide.

 

Nicholas Street section between Platform Street and Dalley Street provides frontage to Phillips Park.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Nicholas Street particularly the wider section between Platform Street and Dalley Street fronting the park due to speeding concerns.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data on Nicholas Street indicated that there were five reported accidents on Nicholas Street in the 5 years up to June 2021. The reported accidents are related to intersection type of crashes 3, pedestrian 1 and leaving parking 1.  Three of the above accidents occurred at the intersection of Nicholas Street and Ostend Street.  

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The map below shows the location of Nicholas Street, Lidcombe.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Nicholas Street in November 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Nicholas St between Platform Street & Dalley Street:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 2,324 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 54.4 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 45.7 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Nicholas Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Nicholas St between Platform Street & Dalley Street - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

15

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

10

Road Characteristics

35

14

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

44

Table 2 – Nicholas St between Platform Street & Dalley Street – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 54.4 km/h which is within acceptable limits.

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street. The traffic conditions in Nicholas Street will be reviewed in 6 months.

Council investigated the  accidents at Nicholas Street and Ostend Street intersection and has applied for grant funding to treat the intersection.Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-030

ST ANN STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on St Ann Street, Merrylands due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends that the conditions in St Ann Street be investigated again and reported back to traffic committee.

 

Report

 

St Ann Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Chetwynd Road and Military Road. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. St Ann Street is approximately 812 long and 12.7m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on St Ann Street due to speeding concerns.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data on St Ann Street indicated that there were no reported accidents on St Ann Street in the 5 years up to June 2021.

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy. The investigation revealed that St Ann Street has traffic calming devices installed such as pedestrian refuges, central and edge line marking between Chetwynd Road and Military Road.

 

The map below shows the location of St Ann Street, Merrylands.

 

 

Two Traffic counts were undertaken on St Ann Street in November 2021. The locations of the traffic counts are marked in red on the map above. The results of the traffic counts indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on St Ann Street

 

 

between Chetwynd Rd & Addlestone Rd

between Addlestone Rd & Military Rd

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Veh/day

2,579

2,907

85th percentile speed (km/hr)

56.9

50.6

Mean (aver) vehicle speed (km/hr)

49.0

40.3

 

The results of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on St Ann Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – St Ann Street - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Scores Achieved

Between Chetwynd Rd & Addlestone Rd

Between Chetwynd Rd & Addlestone Rd

Traffic Study Data

45

20

15

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

0

Road Characteristics

35

16

14

Community Support & other factors

5

5

5

Total

100

41

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 – St Ann Street – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street.

 

Council officers undertook further investigation including site inspections due to the difference in recorded 85th percentile speeds in the two sections and noticed that on-street parking spaces were occupied in similar nature. Therefore, it is proposed to undertake further counts in the street to assess traffic conditions.Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-031

AUBURN ROAD, AUBURN – PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF MEDIAN ISLAND

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    T-28-01/06

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

 

Council has received a request from a resident requesting for the installation of median islands in Auburn Road, Auburn at the pedestrian crossing outside Auburn Library due to dangerous vehicular movements at this location.  

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

 

1.   That the installation of a 15m median islands on both sides of the existing pedestrian crossing in Auburn Road, Auburn in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.   Council to include the project in a future Capital Works Program.

 

 

Report

 

Auburn Road is a local road that runs in a north-south direction. The section of Auburn Road south of Mary Street up to South Parade is part of Auburn Town Centre signposted ‘Local Traffic area’ with 40 km/h speed limit. it has a width of approximately 12m and parking is provided on both sides of the road. 

 

Currently BB centre line marking exists along Auburn Road between Mary Street and Beatrice Street. In accordance with the Road Rules, vehicles are not permitted overtaking on a road with BB centre line marking. The resident alleged that when vehicles stopped at the pedestrian crossing waiting for pedestrians to cross Auburn Road, vehicles behind constantly overtake the existing BB line marking and drive on the other side of the road.

 

Locality Plan

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident database indicated that there was one (1) reported accident (Pedestrian near side) at the pedestrian crossing in the last five years (2016-2021).

 

In accordance with ‘AS2890-1-2004 Off-Street car parking facilities’, the aisle width for parallel parked cars to manoeuvre out of parking shall be 3.6m and as the width of Auburn Road at this section is 12m, it is sufficient to provide a 300mm wide median island on both sides of the pedestrian crossing and maintain parking on both sides. 

In order to improve safety and enforce the Road Rules, it is proposed to install a 15m concrete median islands on both sides of the pedestrian crossing in Aburn Road between Mary Street and Beatrice Street as per attached plan

Attachments

1.      Plan – Auburn Road, Auburn – Proposed median islands   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-032

BLIGH STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Bligh Street, Guildford.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

 

1.   The installation of traffic calming devices on Bligh Street, Guildford in accordance with the attached plan be supported in principle.

i)                

2.   Council consults directly affected residents and report back to Traffic Committee if any objection is received.

 

3.   The proposed works be listed in Council’s future Capital Works Program for construction.

 

 

Report

 

Bligh Street is a local road that runs in a north-south direction between Rawson Road and Caroline Street. Bligh Street is approximately 380m long and 10m wide. It has a speed limit of 50km/hr and parking is permitted on both sides in accordance with the Road Rules unless signposted.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Bligh Street, Guildford.

 

The intersection of Bligh Street, Campbell Hill Road is controlled by traffic signals. The northern end of Bligh Street has a priority-controlled intersection with Caroline Street.

 

Council’s officers have investigated the request for the installation of traffic calming devices on Bligh Street, Guildford in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The map below shows the location of Bligh Street, Guildford.

 

 

Based on the ‘Centre for Road Safety’ crash data, there were no reported crashes in Bligh Street in the last 5-year period.

 

Council undertook traffic counts in Bligh Street, however, the traffic counting tubes were vandalised twice and no valid data was gathered. The street shows signs of speeding including ‘hooning’.

 

Council has undertaken consultation with the residents / owners regarding installation of speed humps in the street. There were 59 letters with an attached survey form distributed to the residents / owners. There were 21 responses received by closing date, 19 in support and 2 objecting to the proposed speed humps.

 

 

 

 

 

Residents supported and objected to the proposal have provided the following comments:

 

Resident Comments

Supporting

1

Support installation of speed humps urgently required. 

2

It’s about time they use this street as a race strip, and they don’t live in this street

3

People drive with speeds of over 80km/hr almost daily. It is extremely risky for children and families living along this street.

4

Please note this Is a necessary action as the street has become almost like a speedway as cars use it as a shortcut to Guildford road or Campbell hill road.

5

Support installation of speed humps but due to health condition and safety reason, proposed speed humps must not be installed Infront of the property.

Objecting

1

I do not support this installation

2

If humps are the only option for council, I support it (however see other considerations below) But I object to place the hump in front of my property. Humps are one way of reducing speed but come as an inconvenience to people residing in the street and using it multiple times a day. Considered other strategies, more police presence. Council led campaign to educate drivers on horns of speeding in residential streets.

 

Based on the above results, majority of the residents are supporting the installation of speed humps. Council prepared a design plan placing speed humps at suitable intervals in the street.

 

Following traffic committee recommendation and Council approval, Council officers will undertake consultation with the directly affected residents.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Bligh Street, Guildford - Proposed Speed Humps   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-033

GILLIVERS PLACE AND MILLS STREET, LIDCOMBE  – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

 

Council has received a request from Lidcombe Public School requesting a marked pedestrian crossing outside the school back gate located at the corner of Gillivers Place and Mills Street, Lidcombe.

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends that;

1.   The installation of a marked pedestrian crossing at the corner of Gillivers Place and Mills Street, Lidcombe not be supported.

i)                

2.   Council install ‘W6-3’ Children Crossing warning signs in Mills Street and Gillivers Place, Lidcombe in accordance with the attached plan.

 

Report

 

This report considers a request from Lidcombe Public School for the installation of a marked pedestrian crossing outside the back gate of the school located in Gillivers Place and Mills Street.

 

The school principal claimed that it is a potential risk for their students crossing Gillivers Place and Mills Street during school hours every day as no crossing facilities are provided at this location.

 

Gillivers Place is classified as a local street. The street has a 40km/h school zone during school hours and a default speed limit of 50km/h outside school hours. The street is approximately 4.5m wide with restricted parking on the western side (school side). It is also a one-way street only allows northbound traffic.

 

Mills Street is classified as a local street. The street has a 40km/h school zone during school hours and a default speed limit of 50km/h outside school hours. The street is approximately 12.5m wide. Parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

 

To provide a pedestrian crossing, Council must satisfy the following warrants given in RMS / Transport for NSW Guidelines:

 

Normal Warrant:

A pedestrian (Zebra) Crossing is warranted where:-

In each of three separate one hour periods in a typical day

 

(a) the pedestrian flow per hour (P) crossing the road is >= 30  AND

(b) the vehicular flow per hour (V) through the site is >= 500  AND

(c) the product PV is >=  60,000

 

Reduced Warrant for sites used predominantly by children and by aged or impaired pedestrians.

 

If the crossing is used predominantly by school children, is not suitable site for a Children’s Crossing and in two counts of one hour duration immediately before and after school hours:-

 

(a) P ≥ 30  AND

(b) V ≥ 200

 

a pedestrian (Zebra) Crossing may be installed.

 

Council undertook a pedestrian and vehicle count at the corner of Gillivers Place and Mills Street on Thursday 14 December 2021. The result of the count is shown in the table below:

 

 

Table  – Traffic count result

 

 

8am – 9am

9am-10am

2pm-3pm

3pm-4pm

 

Veh

Ped

Veh

Ped

Veh

Ped

Veh

Ped

Gillivers Pl

2

20

0

0

0

90

0

9

Mills St

140

26

25

4

77

72

29

26

 

The survey result indicated that Gillivers Place and Mills Street does not meet the numerical warrants for a marked pedestrian crossing. Therefore a marked pedestrian crossing can not be supported.

 

It is proposed to install Children Crossing warning signs (W6-3) in Mills Street and Gillivers Place to alert motorists of the presence of children in the area.

 

Attachments

1.      Plan - Proposed Children Crossing warning signs   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-034

ROAD CLOSURES IN THE AUBURN CBD FOR RAMADAN FOOD FESTIVAL 2022

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    T-28-01/06

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

 

Council has received an application requesting the closure of selected roads in the Auburn CBD to facilitate ‘Ramadan Street Food Festival 2022’.

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the temporary closure of Auburn Road between Queen Street and Beatrice Street and the eastern section of Mary Street, between Harrow Road and Auburn Road, Auburn be approved between the hours of 5AM Saturday, 23rd April 2022 and 5AM Sunday, 24th April 2022 subject to;

 

1.   All affected businesses and emergency stakeholders being notified of the closure.

i)                

2.   Complying with the notification requirements of the Roads Act 1993, i.e., placing public notices in a newspaper and erecting notices on the road.

 

3.   Approval of a Traffic Management Plan by Transport Management Centre.

ii)         

4.   Temporary bus routes and bus zones replacing the existing bus zones in the closed area be provided in consultation with the bus operator.

 

Report

 

Council has received funding from State Government under the program ‘The Festival of Place – Open Streets’. This program aims to support Councils to undertake short term projects involving community events and activities on streets.

 

Ramadan Food Festival 2022’ is one such event Council has initiated under the funding. The event provides free access to cultural event celebrating the local community.

 

Council is committed to delivering the event to focus interest on the

local area, while keeping a community spirit and attracting visitors from the Sydney metropolitan area. The event will involve street stalls with food and merchandise.

The event will commence at 6PM on Saturday 23 April and end at Midnight 12:00AM.

 

Road Closures:

Road closures will be from 5AM on Saturday 23 April to 5AM Sunday 24 April allowing time for setting up and dismantling.

 

The road closure from morning will prevent any parking within the event area and also procide time for event officers to set up stalls and other furniture required for the event.

The closure is as follows;

·      Auburn Road between Queen Street and Beatrice Street

·      Eastern section of Mary Street, between Harrow Road and Auburn Road

 

The map below shows the road closures in yellow.

 

Traffic Management Plan (TMP) including Traffic Control Plans is attached.Attachments

1.      TMP – Ramadan Food Festival 2022   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-035

GILBA ROAD, GIRRAWEEN – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the conversion of the existing at-level pedestrian crossing on Gilba Road, Girraween outside Girraween Public School to a raised pedestrian crossing due to alleged speeding in Gilba Road approaches.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Cumberland Traffic Committee recommends the installation of a raised pedestrian crossing on Gilba Road, Girraween outside Girraween Public School not be supported.

 

Report

Council has received a request from a local resident for the conversion of the existing at-level pedestrian crossing on Gilba Road, Girraween outside Girraween Public School to a raised pedestrian crossing due to alleged speeding in Gilba Road approaches.

Gilba Road is a Collector Road that runs in an east-west direction between Toongabbie Road and Pendle Way. The street has a 40km/h school zone section during school hours and a default speed limit of 50km/h outside school hours. Parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

A marked pedestrian crossing exists outside Girraween Public School. There is also a pedestrian refuge built just west of Tungarra Road which is west of the crossing. Gilba Road has painted median island between the pedestrian refuge and east of the crossing to enhance safety in this section of Gilba Road.

 

 

 

 

 

The map below shows the pedestrian crossing and other devices in Gilba Road.

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and a traffic count was undertaken on both sides of the pedestrian crossing outside the school in November 2021.

The results of the traffic counts indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data for the westbound traffic (towards the crossing) on Gilba Road 30m east of the crossing:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 2,367 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 48 km/h

85th percentile speed from 8am to 9am = 35.8 km/hr

85th percentile speed from 2pm to 3pm = 42.7 km/hr

85th percentile speed from 3pm to 4pm = 38.8 km/hr

 

Traffic count Data for the eastbound traffic (towards the crossing) on Gilba Road 30m west of the crossing

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 2,290 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 47 km/hr

85th percentile speed from 8am to 9am = 37.4 km/hr

85th percentile speed from 2pm to 3pm = 40.6 km/hr

85th percentile speed from 3pm to 4pm = 40.3 km/hr

 

The traffic counts indicated that the recorded 85th percentile speeds for vehicles approaching the existing pedestrian crossing were relatively low and within an acceptable range. The data during school zone times are acceptable. The speed data between 2:00 and 3:00pm only covers 30minutes (between 2:30 to 3:00pm) of school zone.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident database indicated that there were no reported accidents in the last 5 years at this location.

 

Considering the above, conversion of the existing at-level pedestrian crossing to a raised pedestrian crossing not be supported at this time.

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-036

LUMLEY STREET, GRANVILLE – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lumley Street, Granville due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Cumberland Traffic Committee recommends the installation of traffic calming devices on Lumley Street, Granville not be supported.

 

Report

Council has received a request from residents for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lumley Street, Granville due to speeding concerns.

Lumley Street is a local road runs in a north-south direction between Mary Street and William Street. The road is approximately 200m long and 12m wide. The street is a 40km/h school zone during school hours and a default speed limit of 50km/h outside school hours. Parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lumley Street in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

A review of Centre for Road Safety Accident data indicated that there was one reported midblock accident in Lumley Street in the 5 years up to June 2021. This accident occurred during a U-turn by a vehicle. There was another accident occurred at the roundabout at the intersection of William Street and Lumley Street.

 

The map below shows the location of Lumley Street.

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Lumley Street south of Maud Street in November 2021. The traffic count location in shown in red in the map above.

 

The results of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Lumley Street:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 9,201 vehicles/day,

85th percentile speed = 45 km/h,

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 39.2 km/h.

 

The results of the traffic counts, recorded crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Lumley Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy.

 

The LATM assessments are summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Lumley Street - LATM Assessment Points

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

15

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

5

Road Characteristics

35

10

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

35

 

Table 2 – Lumley Street – Action

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

The traffic count indicated that the recorded 85th percentile speed was 45km/h which is well below the speed limit of the street.

 

Based on the above assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street.

 

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-037

EDGAR STREET AND GIBBS STREET, AUBURN - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-03-21

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received funding under the Federal Safer Roads Program 2021/2022 financial year for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Edgar Street and Gibbs Street, Auburn.

This report outlines the outcome of a review into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The construction of the proposed roundabout together with the signs and line marking plan at the intersection of Edgar Street and Gibbs Street, Auburn be approved.

i)                

2.      The affected residents be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

Report

 

Edgar Street, Auburn is a local road that runs in an east-west direction, it has a width of approximately 12.5m with a signposted 50km/h speed limit. Parking is permitted on both sides.

 

Gibbs Street, Auburn is a local road that runs in a north-south direction, it has a width of approximately 12.5m with a signposted 50km/h speed limit. Parking is permitted on both sides.

 

Edgar Street and Gibbs Street form a cross intersection with priority to Edgar Street and ‘Give Way’ signs on Gibbs Street.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1 below shows details of the intersection and surrounding streets.

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

Based on the crash record at the intersection, Council’s Officers have investigated the intersection performance and nominated the site for Black Spot Program 2021/2022 Financial Year. The submission was based on the latest RMS crash data at the time of the application which are summarised below:

 

Crash Period Investigated:          July 2014 – Jun 2019 (5 years)

Total number of crashes:           3

Total number of injury:               3

Primary crash type:                     Cross traffic (RUM 10)

Proposed treatment:                   Proposed roundabout

Treatment cost:                           $210,000

 

Following the submission, Council has received a formal letter from the Transport for NSW advising that the submission for the proposed roundabout at the intersection of Edgar Street and Gibbs Street has received funding of $210,000. This project will need to be constructed/completed within 2021/2022 Financial Year.

 

The design has been prepared to accommodate the movement of Heavy Rigid Vehicle (12.5m long) on all approaches and in accordance with current Roads and Maritime Services / Transport for NSW Guidelines and considered satisfactory. The central island of the roundabout is designed mountable to allow for manoeuvring of right turning trucks.

Swept paths have been provided in the attachment.

 

It is advised that the proposed treatment will slow down traffic, define priority control and improve road safety for all road users.

Attachments

1.      Plans – Edgar Street and Gibbs Street, Auburn – Proposed roundabout  

2.      Turning path disagram for a 12.5m truck   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-038

EXCELSIOR STREET AND BRIGHT STREET, GUILDFORD - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-03-21

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received funding under the Federal Safer Roads Program 2021/2022 financial year for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Excelsior Street and Bright Street, Guildford.

This report outlines the outcome of a review into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The construction of the proposed roundabout together with the signs and line marking plan at the intersection of Excelsior Street and Bright Street, Guildford be approved

i)                

2.      Council forward final design plans to Transport for NSW

ii)         

3.      The affected residents be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

Report

 

Excelsior Street, Guildford is a local road that runs in a north-south direction, it has a width of approximately 12.4m with a signposted 50km/h speed limit. Parking is permitted on both sides.

 

Bright Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Woodville Road and a cul-de-sac at Hope Park and has a width of approximately 11.7m with 50km/h speed limit. Parking is permitted on both sides.

 

Excelsior Street and Bright Street form a cross intersection with priority to Excelsior Street and ’Give Way’ signs on Bright Street.

 

 

Figure 1 below shows details of the intersection and surrounding streets.

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

Based on the crash record at the intersection, Council’s Officers have investigated the intersection performance and nominated the site for Black Spot Program 2021/2022 Financial Year. The submission was based on the latest RMS crash data at the time of the application which are summarised below:

 

Crash Period Investigated:          July 2014 – Jun 2019 (5 years)

Total number of crashes:           5

Total number of injury:               5

Primary crash type:                     Cross traffic (RUM 10)

Proposed treatment:                   Proposed roundabout

Treatment cost:                           $229,000

 

Following the submission, Council has received a formal letter from the Transport for NSW advising that the submission for the proposed roundabout at the intersection of Edgar Street and Gibbs Street has received funding of $229,000. This project will need to be constructed/completed within 2021/2022 Financial Year.

 

The concept plans have been prepared to accommodate the movement of Heavy Rigid Vehicle (12.5m long) on all approaches and in accordance with current Roads and Maritime Services / Transport for NSW Guidelines and considered satisfactory. The central island of the roundabout is designed mountable to allow for manoeuvring of right turning trucks.

 

Swept paths have been provided in the attachment.

 

It is advised that the proposed treatment will slow down traffic, define priority control and improve road safety for all road users.

Council is undertaking final design plans for the roundabout and the plans will be forwarded to transport for NSW

Attachments

1.      Concept Plan – Excelsior Street and Bright Street, Guildford – Proposed roundabout  

2.      Turning path disagram for a 12.5m truck   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-039

HARRIS STREET AND MORRIS STREET, MERRYLANDS - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-03-21

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received funding under the Safer Roads Program 2021/2022 financial year for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Harris Street and Morris Street, Merrylands.

This report outlines the outcome of a review into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends that:

1.      The construction of the proposed roundabout together with the signs and line marking plan at the intersection of Harris Street and Morris Street, Merrylands be approved

i)                

2.      The affected residents be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

Report

Harris Street, Merrylands is 10.5m with a signposted 50/km/h speed limit. Parking is permitted on both sides.

 

Morris Street, Merrylands is a local road that runs in an east-west direction, it has a width of approximately 10.5m with a signposted 50/km/h speed limit. Parking is permitted on both sides.

 

Harris Street and Morris Street form a cross intersection with priority to Harris Street and ‘Give Way’ signs on Morris Street.

 

Figure 1 below shows details of the intersection and surrounding streets.

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

Based on the crash record at the intersection, Council’s Officers have investigated the intersection performance and nominated the site for funding under the Federal Safer Roads Program 2021/2022 Financial Year. The submission was based on the latest RMS crash data at the time of the application which are summarised below:

 

Crash Period Investigated:          July 2014 – Jun 2019 (5 years)

Total number of crashes:           4

Total number of injury:               4

Primary crash type:                     Cross traffic (RUM 10)

Proposed treatment:                   Proposed roundabout

Treatment cost:                           $255,000

 

Following the submission, Council has received a formal letter from the Transport for NSW advising that the submission for the proposed roundabout at the intersection of Edgar Street and Gibbs Street has received funding of $255,000. This project will need to be constructed/completed within 2021/2022 Financial Year.

 

The design has been prepared to accommodate the movement of Heavy Rigid Vehicle (12.5m long) on all approaches and in accordance with current Roads and Maritime Services / Transport for NSW Guidelines and considered satisfactory. The central island of the roundabout is designed mountable to allow for manoeuvring of right turning trucks.

 

Swept paths have been provided in the attachment.

It is advised that the proposed treatment will slow down traffic, define priority control and improve road safety for all road users.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Turning path diagram  

2.      Plan –Harris Street and Morris Street, Merrylands – Proposed roundabout   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-040

ROSEBERY ROAD AND RHODES AVENUE, GUILDFORD - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-03-21

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received funding under the Federal Safer Roads Program 2021/2022 financial year for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Rosebery Road and Rhodes Avenue, Guildford.

This report outlines the outcome of a review into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The construction of the proposed roundabout together with the signs and line marking plan at the intersection of Rosebery Road and Rhodes Avenue, Guildford be approved.

 

2.      The affected residents be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

Report

Rosebery Road, Guildford is a local road that runs in an east-west direction, it has a width of approximately 12.5m with a signposted 50/km/h speed limit. Parking is permitted on both sides.

 

Rhodes Avenue is a local road that runs in a north-south direction, it has a width of approximately 12.5m with a signposted 50/km/h speed limit. Parking is permitted on both sides.

 

Rosebery Road and Rhodes Avenue form a cross intersection with priority to Rosebery Road and ‘STOP’ signs on Rhodes Avenue.

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1 below shows details of the intersection and surrounding streets.

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

Based on the crash record at the intersection, Council’s Officers have investigated the intersection performance and nominated the site for Black Spot Program 2021/2022 Financial Year. The submission was based on the latest RMS crash data at the time of the application which are summarised below:

 

Crash Period Investigated:          July 2014 – Jun 2019 (5 years)

Total number of crashes:           5

Total number of injury:               5

Primary crash type:                     Cross traffic (RUM 10)

Proposed treatment:                   Proposed roundabout

Treatment cost:                           $300,000

 

Following the submission, Council has received a formal letter from the Transport for NSW advising that the submission for the proposed roundabout at the intersection of Edgar Street and Gibbs Street has received funding of $300,000. This project will need to be constructed/completed within 2021/2022 Financial Year.

 

The concept plans have been prepared to accommodate the movement of Heavy Rigid Vehicle (12.5m long) on all approaches and in accordance with current Roads and Maritime Services / Transport for NSW Guidelines and considered satisfactory. The central island of the roundabout is designed mountable to allow for manoeuvring of right turning trucks.

 

Swept paths have been provided in the attachment.

 

It is advised that the proposed treatment will slow down traffic, define priority control and improve road safety for all road users.

Council is undertaking final design plans for the roundabout and the plans will be forwarded to transport for NSW

Attachments

1.      Concept Plan – Rosebery Road & Rhodes Avenue, Guildford – Proposed roundabout  

2.      Turning path disagram for a 12.5m truck   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-041

TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE FOR ‘GRANVILLE ACTIVATION 2022’ FUNDING AGREEMENT

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-03-21

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received funding from the State Government to carry out short term demonstration projects involving community events and activities on or in streets within Cumberland Local Government Area (LGA). As part of this funding, ‘Granville Activation 2022’ is proposed to be held in South Street, Granville.

This report outlines the proposal and the road closure involved in the project.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends that the temporary closure of South Street, Granville from 7:00 AM Sunday 15 May 2022 to 7:00PM Tuesday 24 May 2022 between Mary Street and Russell Street in accordance with the Traffic Management Plan be supported, subject to below conditions:

 

1.   All affected residents, businesses and emergency stakeholders being notified of the closure.

i)                

2.   Complying with the notification requirements of the Roads Act 1993, i.e., placing public notices in a newspaper and erecting notices on the road.

ii)         

3.   The Traffic Management Plan and Special Event Application form be submitted to Transport for NSW and Transport Management Centre for approval.

 

Report

Council has received funding from the State Government to carry out short term demonstration projects involving community events and activities on or in streets within Cumberland Local Government Area (LGA).

As part of this funding, ‘Granville Activation 2022’ is proposed to be held in South Street, Granville.

The event will be between Monday 16 May 2022 until Monday 23 May 2022. Council’s Events Department will manage the activities and activations. To carry out the event/activities safely, it is requested for a temporary full road closure during the activities period.

 

Road Closure:

 

The road closure will be affected from 7:00 AM Sunday 15 May 2022 to 7:00PM Tuesday 24 May 2022. The road closure period before and after the event will provide sufficient time for Event officers to erect and dismantle any temporary structures in the closed area.

 

It should be noted that there is no existing bus route through the closed section of South Street.

 

The map below shows location of proposed temporary full road closure of South Street between Russell Street and Mary Street, Granville.

 

 

Plans showing he closure and detours are attached.

 

The TMP together any other required documents will be forwarded to Transport for NSW for final approval.

Attachments

1.      Traffic Management Plan and Traffic Control Plan   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-042

BELMONT STREET, MERRYLANDS – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Belmont Street, Merrylands due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the installation of traffic calming devices on Belmont Street, Merrylands not be supported.

 

Report

 

Belmont Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Chetwynd Road and Military Road. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Belmont Street is approximately 933m long and 11.7m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Belmont Street due to speeding concerns.

 

The Centre for Road Safety accident data on Belmont Street indicated that there were two reported accidents on Belmont Street in the 5 years up to June 2021. There was one crash in mid-block between Chetwynd Road and Roseberry Street and one intersection crash at the intersection of Belmont Street and Roseberry Street during the 5 years period.

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The map below shows the location of Belmont Street, Merrylands.

 

 

Two Traffic counts were undertaken on Belmont Street in November 2021. The locations of the traffic counts are marked in red on the map above. The results of the traffic counts indicated the following:

 

 

From Chetwynd Rd to Roseberry St

From Roseberry St to Military Rd

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) - vehicles/day

468

272

85th percentile speed - km/h

54.7

49.8

Mean (average) vehicle speed - km/h

45

39

 

The results of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Belmont Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Belmont Street - Two sections

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

 

 

From Chetwynd Rd to Roseberry St

From Roseberry St to Military Rd

Traffic Study Data

45

0

0

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

5

5

Road Characteristics

35

13

13

Community Support & other factors

5

5

5

Total

100

23

23

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 – Belmont Street – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic counts, the recorded 85th percentile speeds in two sections of Belmont Street were 54.7 and 49.8 km/h which are within acceptable limits.

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in Belmont Street, Merrylands.

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-043

CUMBERLAND ROAD, AUBURN – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Cumberland Road, Auburn between Chiswick Road and Elm Road due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.   The installation of traffic calming devices on Cumberland Road, Auburn not be supported.

i)                

2.   Council review conditions in Cumberland Road, Auburn in June 2023 and report back to traffic committee.

 

Report

 

Cumberland Road, Auburn is a local road that runs in a north-south direction between St Johns Road and The Crescent. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Cumberland Road is approximately 2.8 km long and 12.5m wide between St Johns Road and The Crescent.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Cumberland Road. The resident has raised speeding in the vicinity of their property in the section between Chiswick Road and Elm Road.

 

For this investigation, Council has considered the section of Cumberland Road between Chiswick Road and Rickard Street which comprises the section where the resident has complained.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data on Cumberland Road indicated that there were three reported accidents in the section in the 5 years up to June 2021. All three accidents were intersection accidents.

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy. The investigation revealed that Cumberland Road have traffic calming devices such as roundabout, blister islands, central and edge line marking.

 

The map below shows the location of Cumberland Road between Chiswick Road and Rickard Street.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Cumberland Road in December 2021 between Chiswick Road and Rickard Street. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Cumberland Rd between Chiswick Rd and Rickard St:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 1,378 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 49.7 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 43.7 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Cumberland Road between Chiswick Road and Rickard Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Cumberland Rd between Chiswick Rd & Rickard St - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

10

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

10

Road Characteristics

35

12

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

37

 

Table 2 – Cumberland Rd between Chiswick Rd & Rickard St – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 49.7 km/h which is below speed limit of the street.

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street.

This will be reviewed in 12 months.Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-044

DRIFTWAY DRIVE, PEMULWUY – REQUEST TO REMOVE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the removal of the existing refuge islands in front of 92 Driftway Drive, Pemulwuy.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the request for the removal of pedestrian refuge in front of 92 Driftway Drive, Pemulwuy not be approved.

 

Report

 

Driftway Drive is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a posted speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 8.8m and parking restrictions apply on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

The latest accident data indicated that there is no reported accident near property 92 Driftway Drive, Pemulwuy in the last 5 years.

Council has received a request from a local resident requesting to remove existing pedestrian refuge in front of 92 Driftway Drive. The resident has alleged that the access driveway is restricted (i.e., in and out of property).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The map below shows the location of pedestrian refuge at 92 Driftway Drive, Pemulwuy.

 

 

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and found that the refuge islands were installed as part of the approved Pemulwuy Masterplan. The devices are in accordance with Australian Standards and it were installed to provide a safer crossing point for pedestrian and cyclists in the area.

 

There are 2 pedestrian refuges on Driftway Drive on the northern and southern side of Miles Crescent. The southern pedestrian refuge would likely assist pedestrians from crossing Driftway Drive and the northern refuge islands would provide pedestrian and cyclists from crossing Driftway Drive. The existing cycleway is located on the western side of Driftway Drive and is a major connection to the existing cycleway network within Pemulwuy area. The refuge islands outside 92 Driftway Drive provide direct access to the off-street shared pathway on the western side. In addition to this, the pedestrian refuges change the road widths creating deflection on vehicle travel paths to reduce speeding in the precinct. Miles crescent is a one-way street and the intersections have been treated for safer exit from Miles Crescent. It shall be noted that Miles Crescent comprises apartments.

 

The subject property has been designed as only left in movements as part of the masterplan of this precinct. Similar arrangements are existing within the precinct and other areas in the LGA.

 

Generally residential driveways are designed for ‘B85’ (85th percentile) vehicles, however, this driveway would cater for ‘B99’ (99th percentile vehicle) also.

 

Council has provided swept path analysis for ‘B85’ and ‘B99’ as part of the attachment. It is noted that both templates show that vehicles can access the garage without the removal of the islands. Therefore, the removal of the islands is not recommended for the above safety reasons.

 

Attachments

1.      Swept path analysis - B85 vehicle  

2.      Swept path analysis - B99 vehicle   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-045

KIRKHAM ROAD, AUBURN – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Kirkham Road, Auburn due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.   The installation of traffic calming devices on Kirkham Road, Auburn not be supported.

i)                

2.   Council review conditions in Kirkham Road, Auburn in June 2023 and report back to traffic committee.

 

Report

 

Kirkham Road is a local road that runs mainly in an east-west direction between Chisholm Road and Raglan Road. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Kirkham Road is approximately 385m long east-west and 110m long after the 90-degree bend towards Raglan Road. Kirkham Road is approximately 11.5m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Kirkham Road, Auburn due to speeding concerns.

 

The Centre for Road Safety accident data on Kirkham Road indicated that there was one reported accident in the 5 years up to June 2021. The accident occurred while emerging from drive.

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The map below shows the location of Kirkham Road, Auburn.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Kirkham Road in December 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Kirkham Road, Auburn:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 561 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 51.1 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 41.6 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Kirkham Road in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 – Kirkham Road, Auburn - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

5

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

5

Road Characteristics

35

10

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

25

 

Table 2 – Kirkham Road, Auburn – LATM Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 51.1 km/h which is within acceptable limits.

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street.

This will be reviewed in 12 months.Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-046

PENDLE WAY, PENDLE HILL – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Pendle Way, Pendle Hill between Dunmore Street and Magowar Road due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the installation of traffic calming devices on Pendle Way, Pendle Hill not be supported.

 

Report

 

Pendle Way is a local collector road that runs in a north-south direction between Great Western Highway and Joyce Street. Pendle Way has a sharp bend at Pendle Hill station and links with Joyce Street that runs parallel to railway line. 

 

The speed limit in Pendle Way is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. There is a School Zone in Pendle Way around Pendle Hill Public School. Pendle Way has ‘BB’ centre lines marked.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident raising concerns about speeding in the section of Pendle Way between Dunmore Street and Magowar Road.

 

Pendle Way between Dunmore Street and Magowar Road is approximately 265m long and 12.4m wide.

 

The intersection of Pendle Way and Magowar Road is controlled by a roundabout. The intersection of Pendle Way and Dunmore Street has traffic signal control.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data indicated that there was one reported accident on Pendle Way between Dunmore Street and Magowar Road in the 5 years up to June 2021. The reported accident can be considered an off path on straight crash type (RUM code 71).

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The map below shows the location of Pendle Way, Pendle Hill.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Pendle Way in November 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Pendle Way, Pendle Hill:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 11,160 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 50.8 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 45.2 km/h

 

The result of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Pendle Way in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

 

 

 

Table 1 – Pendle Way, Pendle Hill - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

15

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

5

Road Characteristics

35

13

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

38

 

Table 2 – Pendle Way, Pendle Hill – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was 50.8 KM/H which are within acceptable limits.

 

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street.

This will be reviewed in 12 months.Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-047

WILLOUGHBY STREET, GUILDFORD – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Willoughby Street, Guildford due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends that Council undertake consultation with residents of Willoughby Street, Guildford to assess support or otherwise for the installation of traffic calming devices in the street.

 

Report

 

Willoughby Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Excelsior Street and Robertson Street. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Willoughby Street is approximately 325m long and 10.5m wide.

 

Council previously undertook review of conditions in Willoughby Street, Guildford and reported to Cumberland Traffic Committee in February 2020. The traffic committee recommended that,

1.   The report be received, and no further action be taken at this stage in regard to speed humps.

2.   Council request Cumberland Police Area Command to undertake speed surveillance in Willoughby Street, Guildford.

Council approved the recommendations subsequently.

 

Council has received further concerns from a local resident in Willoughby Street concerning speeding in the street.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data indicated that there were no reported accidents on Willoughby Street in the 5 years up to June 2021.  

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy.

 

The map below shows the location of Willoughby Street, Guildford.

 

 

A traffic count was undertaken on Willoughby Street in late November 2021. The location of the traffic count is marked in red on the map above. The result of the traffic count indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Willoughby St Guildford:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 452 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 59.0 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 47.5 km/h

 

The recent traffic count data together with the previous data is tabulated below:

 

 

March 2018

December 2019

November 2021

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)

464

439

452

85th %tile speed (km/hr)

60.5

57.2

59.0

Mean (average) vehicle speed (km/hr)

48.4

46.3

47.5

 

The result of the recent traffic count, reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Willoughby Street in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

 

Table 1 – Willoughby St, Guildford - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

10

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

0

Road Characteristics

35

13

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

28

 

Table 2 – Willoughby St, Guildford – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

Based on the traffic count, the recorded 85th percentile speed was significantly higher than the posted speed limit. It is proposed to undertake consultation with the residents of Willoughby Street for the installation of traffic calming devices.

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-048

PERCY STREET, AUBURN – PROPOSED PARKING RESTRICTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-03-21

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received detailed design for the proposed installation of pedestrian crossing associated with an approved development application at The International Maarif Schools of Australia (IMSA) Gallipoli Campus Auburn located on Percy Street, Auburn.

This report outlines the outcome of a review into this matter.

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The request for a pedestrian crossing on Percy Street, Auburn outside the school not be approved.

i)           

2.      The proposed ‘No Parking; 8:00AM-9:30AM; 2:30PM-4:00PM; School Days’ and ‘Bus Zone; 8:00AM-9:30AM; 2:30PM-4:00PM; School Days’ signs in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

ii)             

3.      The costs associated with the installation of the signage shall be borne by the applicant at no cost to Council.

iii)       

4.      The applicant be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

Report

 

The International Maarif Schools of Australia (IMSA) Gallipoli Campus, Auburn was approved in March 2020 involving the staged construction of a new K-12 school, with capacity for 728 primary and secondary students and 58 full-time equivalent staff. The school currently has from Kindergarten to Year 5.

 

The approved plans for the project include a bus zone and pick-up and drop-off zone along the Percy Street frontage of the site, along with a new pedestrian crossing across Percy Street near the intersection with Gelibolu Parade. However, currently the number of students in the school (in Kindergarten to Year 5) is very much lower than the expected final enrolment of 728 students.

 

Council has received detailed design for the proposed pedestrian crossing associated with an approved development application.

 

The map below shows the location of Percy Street, Auburn.

 

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and the investigation revealed that a pedestrian (zebra) crossing would require to meet current Australian Standard and RMS / Transport for NSW requirements.

 

To provide a pedestrian crossing, Council must satisfy the following warrants given in RMS / Transport for NSW Guidelines:

 

Normal Warrant:

A pedestrian (Zebra) Crossing is warranted where:

In each of three separate one hour periods in a typical day

(a) the pedestrian flow per hour (P) crossing the road is >= 30 AND

(b) the vehicular flow per hour (V) through the site is >= 500 AND

(c) the product PV is >= 60,000

 

Reduced Warrant for sites used predominantly by children and by aged or impaired pedestrians.

 

 

 

If the crossing is used predominantly by school children, and in two counts of one-hour duration immediately before and after school hours:

(a) P ≥ 30 AND

(b) V ≥ 200

 

a pedestrian (Zebra) Crossing may be installed.

 

Since the school is with limited number of students at this stage prior to final completion and no pedestrian and vehicle counts have been provided to support the request. Council officers believe that the numerical warrants required for a pedestrian crossing will not be satisfied considering the low number of students currently enrolled and there is no walking catchment for the school from the eastern side of Percy Street.

 

However, Council proposes to provide ‘No Parking; 8:00 AM-9:30AM; 2:30PM-4:00PM’ signage for drop off / pick up and a school time Bus Zone as requested by the consultants on behalf of the school.

A pedestrian crossing request could be considered in the future subject to the satisfaction of the numerical warrants once the construction of the development is fully completed.

Attachments

1.      Plans – Percy Street, Auburn – Proposed signage outside the International Maarif Schools of Australia at No 2 Percy Street Auburn.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-049

WHALANS ROAD, GREYSTANES – ROAD SAFETY CONCERNS

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Prospect

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Whalans Road, Greystanes due to speeding concerns.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends Council undertake consultation with the residents of Whalans Road, Greystanes to assess support or otherwise for the installation of traffic calming devices in the street and report back to traffic committee.

 

Report

 

Whalans Road is a local road that runs in an east-west direction between Greystanes Road and Cumberland Road. The speed limit is 50km/h and parking are permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted. Whalans Road is approximately 1530m long and 10.6m wide.

 

Council has received a request from a local resident for the installation of traffic calming devices on Whalans Road between Cumberland Road and Gozo Road due to speeding concerns.

 

Background:

 

Cumberland Traffic Committee at its meeting held on 1st November 2017 considered a report regarding proposed speed humps on Whalans Road, Greystanes and recommended that:

 

1.   The provision of a traffic calming device scheme incorporating speed humps on Whalans Road, Greystanes be approved in principle.

 

2.   The affected resident be consulted, and the result reported back to the Traffic Committee with a detailed scheme.

 

Following consultation with the residents, the speed humps were not approved as the majority of the residents did not support the proposal.

 

Subsequently, Cumberland Traffic Committee and Council approved the installation of pavement marking (double barrier (BB) lines and ‘E1’ edge lines) as part of the traffic calming measures in Whalans Road.

 

The pavement marking was completed in late 2018.

 

Council has received continued community concerns regarding speeding in the street.

 

The latest Centre for Road Safety accident data indicated that there were seven reported accidents on Whalans Road between Cumberland Road and Greystanes Road in the 5 years up to June 2021.

 

Council officers have investigated the request in accordance with Council’s Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Policy between Gozo Road and Cumberland Road. The investigation revealed that Whalans Road has few traffic calming devices  such as roundabouts and edge and central line marking.

 

The map below shows the location of Whalans Road, Greystanes.

 

 

Two Traffic counts were undertaken on Whalans Road in December 2021. The locations of the traffic counts are marked in red on the map above. The results of the traffic counts indicated the following:

 

Traffic count Data on Whalans Rd between Gozo Rd & Kippax St:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 2,572 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 56.9 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 48.2 km/h

 

The results of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Whalans Road in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 1 –Whalans Rd between Gozo Rd & Kippax St - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

20

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

5

Road Characteristics

35

15

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

45

 

Table 2 – Whalans Rd between Gozo Rd & Kippax St – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Traffic count Data on Whalans Rd between Kippax St & Cumberland Rd:

 

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 2663 vehicles/day

85th percentile speed = 61. 6 km/h

Mean (average) vehicle speed = 54 km/h

 

The results of the traffic count reported crashes etc. were used in the assessment to determine the need for the installation of traffic calming devices on Whalans Road in accordance with the criteria set out in Council’s Local area Traffic Management Policy (LATM) Policy. The LATM assessment is summarised in the tables below:

 

Table 3 – Whalans Rd between Cumberland Rd & Kippax St - LATM Assessment Points

 

Criteria

Maximum Score

Score Achieved

Traffic Study Data

45

30

Crash warrant in the last 5 years

15

10

Road Characteristics

35

13

Community Support & other factors

5

5

Total

100

58

 

 

 

Table 4 – Whalans Rd between Cumberland Rd & Kippax St – Action

 

Criteria

Action

>75

Report to TC with a recommendation of providing traffic calming devices

61-75

Report to TC and discuss possibility of providing traffic calming devices

41-60

Council to review traffic data in 6 months

25-40

Monitor street and review traffic data after 12 months

<25

Do Nothing

Speed

That regardless of the total points scored, should the 85th percentile speed exceed the posted speed limit by 5 km/h, the street be referred to the NSW Police for monitoring and/or enforcement.

 

Based on the LATM assessment, traffic calming devices are not warranted in the street. However, the recorded 85th percentile speeds are high, particularly in the section at the frontage of the Golf Course.

 

Comparison of 85th percentile speeds:

 

 

September 2017

December 2021

Between Gozo Rd & Kippax St

-

56.9 km/hr

Between Kippax St & Cumberland Rd

65 km/hr

61.6 km/hr

 

It can be seen from the recorded 85th percentile speeds above, the speeds have been high at the frontage of the Golf course compared to the other section. However, the recorded 85th percentile speed in December 2021 has reduced by approximately 5% from 65 km/hr to 61.6 km/hr. The line marking in the street may have assisted in reducing the speeds in this section.

 

It is proposed to undertake further consultation with the residents to assess the support of residents for speed humps in Whalans Road, Greystanes.

Attachments

Nil

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-050

PARK ROAD, BERALA AT YORK STREET - SAFER ROADS PROGRAM 2021/2022

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    T-28-01/06

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received funding under the Federal Safer Roads Program 2021/2022 financial year for the construction of a Median Island with associated signage and line marking at the intersection of Park Road and York Street, Berala.

This report outlines the outcome of a review into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The construction of the proposed median island associated with signage and line marking at the intersection of Park Road and York Street, Berala be approved.

i)                

2.      The affected residents be notified of Council’s resolution.

 

 

Report

 

Park Road is a Regional road that runs in a north-south direction, it has a width of approximately 12m and parking permitted on both sides of the road.

 

York Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction, it has a width of approximately 12m and parking permitted on both sides of the road.

 

Park Road and York Street form a T-intersection at the subject site with priority to Park Road.

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1 below shows details of the intersection.

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

Based on the crash record at the intersection, Council’s Officers have investigated the intersection and nominated the site for Safer Roads Program 2021/2022 Financial Year. The submission was based on the latest RMS crash data at the time of the application which are summarised below:

 

Crash Period Investigated:          July 2014 – Jun 2019 (5 years)

Total number of crashes:           5

Total number of injury:               5

Primary crash type:                     Right Far/Right Near (RUM 11,15)

Proposed treatment:                   Median Island

Treatment cost:                           $120,000

 

Following the submission, Council has received a formal letter from the Transport for NSW advising that the submission for the proposed Median Island at the intersection of Park Road and York Street has received funding of $120,000. This project will need to be constructed/completed within 2021/2022 Financial Year.

 

The design has been prepared to accommodate the movement of Heavy Rigid Vehicle (12.5m long) on all approaches and in accordance with current Roads and Maritime Services / Transport for NSW Guidelines and considered satisfactory.

 

Swept paths have been checked for the left turning traffic from York Street.

It is advised that the proposed treatment will slow down traffic, define priority control and improve road safety for all road users.

Attachments

1.      Plans – Park Road and York Street, Berala – Intersection Treatment   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-051

JOHN STREET, LIDCOMBE AT THE INTERSETION OF ELIMATTA STREET AND EDITH STREET– PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ RESTRICTIONS AND LINE MARKING

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    T-28-01/06

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

 

Council has received concerns from a resident requesting intersection treatment at the staggered intersection of John Street with Elimatta Street and Edith Street.

 

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

 

The Traffic Committee recommends:

 

1.   The installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs and ‘BB’ centre lines at the intersection of John Street, Elimatta Street and Edith Street in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.   The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome.

 

 

Report

 

John Street is a collector road that runs in a north-south direction with a speed limit of 60 km/h. It has a width of approximately 12.5m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Elimatta Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/h. It has a width of approximately 12m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Edith Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/h. It has a width of approximately 12m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

John Street, Elimatta Street and Edith Street form a staggered intersection with priority to John Street. No ‘Give Way’ signs or line marking are provided on Elimatta Street and Edith Street (Figure 1). 

 

Figure 1 – Locality Plan

 

A review of the Centre for Road Safety Accident database indicated that there were no reported accidents at this staggered intersection in the last five years ending March 2021.

 

During site inspections, it was observed that there are no ‘No Stopping’ signs at this staggered intersection. It will be unsafe if vehicles park close to the intersection, particularly John Street being a collector road carrying large volume of traffic.

 

The installation of statutory ‘No Stopping’ signs would strengthen the Road Rules requirement and stop vehicles from parking too close to the intersection. It would also improve sight distance requirements. It is also proposed to install “BB” centre lines on the approaches to the intersection.

Attachments

1.      Plan – John Street, at the intersection of Elimatta Street and Edith Street – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ parking restrictions and ‘BB’ centre line marking   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-052

KERR PARADE, AUBURN– APPLICATION FOR ‘WORKS ZONE’ SIGNAGE

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    T-28-01/06

Electorate:                                        Auburn

Police Area Command (PAC):      Auburn   

 

 

Summary

Council has received an application for a ‘Works Zone’ on Kerr Parade, Auburn associated with the development at 30 Kerr Parade, Auburn.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.   The 12m long ‘Works Zone, 7:00am-6:00pm, Monday-Friday, 8:00am-4:00pm, Saturday’ signs be installed on the frontage of the development site on Kerr Parade, Auburn subject to Council’s standard conditions for the period of 12 months and subsequent extension if required.

i)                

2.   Council undertake consultation with Amity College concerning the loss of drop off / pick up spaces for the school prior to commencement of the Works Zone.

ii)         

3.   The applicant be advised to pay the ‘Works Zone’ fees to Council as per the adopted Fees and Charges.

 

 

Report

Council has received an application for a ‘Works Zone’ on Kerr Parade, Auburn associated with the development at 30 Kerr Parade, Auburn. The proposed development involves construction of 12 storey boarding house with ground floor commercial tenancy and 4 levels of basement parking.

The temporary “Works Zone” is approximately 12m in length and proposed to commence in March 2022 for 12 months. The proposed time is between 7:00am to 6:00pm Monday to Friday and 8:00am to 4:00pm on Saturdays.

 

 

There will be a loss of two (2) one hour (1P) on-street parking spaces on the western side of Kerr Parade, Auburn during the operation of the “Works Zone”.  This area is sign posted “No Parking, 8:00AM-9:30AM, 2:30PM-4:00PM, School Days” for drop off / pick up of students of Amity College. However, the two spaces are at the frontage of the property being developed and considered essential for a works zone for the development.

 

Council generally provides School drop off / pick up areas at the frontage of the school only. However, in this instance the drop off/pick up area was extended with consent from the owner of the property that is being developed.

 

Council will undertake consultation with the school to address the shortfall.Attachments

1.      Plan – Kerr Parade, Auburn – Proposed Temporary ‘Works Zone’ signage   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-053

LOCKWOOD STREET AND LEEDS STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED ‘NO STOPPING’ SIGNS AND ‘BB’ LINEMARKING

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    HC-24-01-3/02

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns at the intersection of Lockwood Street and Leeds Street, Merrylands.

This report outlines the outcome of the investigation into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.      The proposed installation of ‘No Stopping’ signs at the intersection of Lockwood Street and Leeds Street, Merrylands in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

i)                

2.      The adjacent residents be notified of the outcome generally

 

Report

 

Lockwood Street is a local road that runs in a north-south direction with a speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 10.7m at its intersection and parking permitted on both sides of the road unless signposted.

 

Leeds Street is a local road that runs in an east-west direction with a speed limit of 50 km/hr. It has a width of approximately 10.2m and parking is permitted on both sides of the road in accordance with Road Rules unless signposted.

 

Lockwood Street and Leeds Street form an intersection with priority to Lockwood Street and ‘Stop’ signs on Leeds Street.

 

Cumberland Traffic Committee at its meeting in June 2021 considered a report (CTC-21-127) on road safety concerns in Lockwood Street, Merrylands and recommended the installation of line marking on Lockwood Street, Merrylands between Merrylands Road and Walpole Street. As part of this line marking, ‘BB’ centre lines were approved on all approaches to the intersection of Lockwood Street and Leeds Street.

Council has received a complaint from a local resident regarding road safety concerns following a recent accident at this intersection.

 

The map below shows the intersection of Lockwood Street and Leeds Street.

 

 

Council’s Officers have investigated the request and found that there are no ‘No Stopping’ signs installed at this intersection.

 

Therefore, it is proposed to the install statutory 10m ‘No Stopping’ zones at this intersection to strengthen the Road Rules requirement and improve sight distance.

The previously approved line marking and the ‘No Stopping’ signs at this intersection would enhance road safety for all road users at this intersection.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Lockwood Street and Leeds Street, Merrylands – Proposed ‘No Stopping’ signs.   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-054

NEIL STREET, MERRYLANDS – PROPOSED LEFT IN / LEFT OUT ARRANGEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    DA2012/493/1

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council proposes to install ‘No Right Turn’ signage at the intersection of Neil Street and the new road created as part of the Neil Street Masterplan to strengthen the left in/Left out arrangement at this new intersection.

This report outlines the outcome of a review into this matter.

 

 

Recommendation

The Traffic Committee recommends the proposed ‘No Right Turn’ signage at the intersection of Neil Street and the new road in accordance with the attached plan be approved.

 

Report

 

Council proposes to install ‘No Right Turn’ signage at the intersection of Neil Street and the new road created as part of the Neil Street Masterplan to strengthen the left in/Left out arrangement at this new intersection.

 

The new intersection is approximately 130m from the signalised intersection of Neil Street and Pitt Street and approximately 110m from the bridge over the railway lines.

It was originally proposed to install traffic signal control at this intersection. However, following discussions with the Roads and Maritime Services (now Transport for NSW), the proposal to provide a Left in / Left out arrangement was decided as appropriate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The map below shows the location of the intersection.

 

 

A street view of the intersection is shown below.

 

 

A triangular island has been built in the new road at the intersection to physically ban right turning movements into and out of the road. However, to strengthen the ban, it is proposed to install no right turn signs on Neil Street and the New road.

Attachments

1.      Plan – Neil Street, Merrylands – Proposed no right turn signage   

 


Traffic Committee

 2 March 2022

 

Item No: CTC-22-055

BLAXCELL STREET, GRANVILLE – REVIEW OF PROPOSED RELOCATION OF THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND ASSOCIATED SIGNAGE – FEDERAL STIMULUS PROGRAM

Responsible Division:                    Environment & Planning

Officer:                                              Engineering Administration Officer

File Number:                                    T-28-01/06

Electorate:                                        Granville

Police Area Command (PAC):      Cumberland   

 

 

Summary

Council received objections for the proposed construction of the pedestrian crossing on Blaxcell Street, Granville as per CTC-21-208.

This report considers a review options for the proposal.

 

 

Recommendation

Two options are provided for traffic committee consideration.

Option 1:

The Traffic Committee recommends that previously approved option recommended by Cumberland Traffic Committee (CTC-20-034 & 035 and CTC -21-208) and approved by Council be approved for construction.

Option 2:

The Traffic Committee recommends that no further action taken in this regard to relocating the bus stop and the raised pedestrian crossing.

 

Report

Background:

Council has received complaints in relation to queuing of vehicles on Blaxcell Street to access the service station on Blaxcell Street. Long queues on southbound lane occupies the kerbside lane and blocks access to existing bus stop which forces the buses to stop in the middle traffic lane to drop off and pick up of patrons.

The queue on the northbound lane to turn right to access the service station blocks the pedestrian crossing and compromises pedestrian safety.

Therefore, Council commenced the process to relocate both the pedestrian crossing and the bus stop to improve safety of road users and constructing a median to prohibit right turns at this location to improve northbound traffic flow.

Cumberland Traffic Committee at its meeting in February 2020 considered two reports (vide Item No. CTC-20-034 & CTC-20-035) to relocate the existing raised pedestrian crossing on Blaxcell Street at Thomas Street and the ‘Bus Zone’ on the eastern side of Blaxcell Street.

Council’s initial proposal was to relocate the crossing to a location just south of the existing roundabout of Blaxcell Street and Louis Street. Also, it was proposed to relocate the existing ‘Bus Zone’ on the eastern side of Blaxcell Street south of Charles Street to a location north of Charles Street.

The traffic committee recommended to relocate the raised pedestrian crossing to a location south of Celia Street instead of the initial proposal due to the proximity of the location to the roundabout as it will compromise the performance of this busy roundabout . Also, similarly, recommended to move the bus stop (‘Bus Zone’) to a new location together with the crossing south of Celia Street.

Council approved the traffic committee recommendations at its meeting held on 4 March 2020.

Council submitted the proposal for construction under the Federal Government Stimulus Program in 2020/21 and received funding.

 

The works were scheduled to commence in June 2021. Council received objections from a resident who will lose the on-street parking within their frontage due to the parking restrictions associated with the new relocated crossing.

 

At a site meeting with the residents, Council officers were requested to consider alternate locations for the crossing and a location was suggested. A report (CTC-21-208) was presented to Local Traffic Committee in August 2021 with the following two options:

Option 1:

The Traffic Committee recommends:

1.   The relocation of the raised pedestrian crossing and ‘Bus Zone’ on Blaxcell Street be approved as per the amended option 3 in the attached plan.

2.   Council consult affected businesses and properties.

Option 2:

The Traffic Committee recommends that previously approved option recommended by Cumberland traffic committee (CTC-20-034 & 035) and approved by Council be approved for construction.

 

Members of the traffic committee recommended and Council subsequently approved option 2 as it has less impact on the local businesses, residents and road networks. This means there is no change to the previously approved location.

 

Changed proposal:

 

In February 2022, before the construction commenced, Council received objections from the same resident who requested at a site meeting with council officers that consideration be given to relocate the raised pedestrian crossing to a location further south.

 

The map below shows the approved location and the new location requested.

 

 

Map -1

 

Council officers have investigated new location and summarise the outcome below:

 

The approved option is to relocate the pedestrian crossing from one side of the intersection to the other side by maintaining the current crossing warrants and also the location change will not have significant impact on the current (existing) pedestrian movements and the necessity of the existing crossing.

 

Relocation preferred by the traffic committee and subsequently approved by Council fulfills the intentions of the relocation and addresses concerns raised regarding the existing location.

 

Following objections from a resident to Option 1 as marked in map 1 above (approved option), Council officers have investigated the location suggested at the site meeting and found the following issues with the location.

 

·    The alternate location is more than 60 metres from the proposed location which is more than 100 from the existing raised pedestrian crossing and far from any pedestrian generators. Also, the relocation needs to be further south due to the presence of existing driveways on both sides of the road.

i)                

·    Due to its distance from the existing location, Council is required to check the pedestrian and vehicle numerical warrants as a new crossing. As there are no significant pedestrian generators at this location, the numerical warrants for the pedestrians are unlikely to be satisfied. Also, a viable new location will be in the proximity of the existing roundabout at Membrey Street. It shall be noted that Council has not received any safety concerns of pedestrians who are using the existing pedestrian facility on the northern side of the roundabout.

ii)         

·    The approved location has residential driveways on one side only and clear kerbside on the other side facilitating locating the relocated crossing. The new location further south is outside other residences and Council may receive objections from those residents in similar nature.

iii)       

·    As subject construction is funded under ‘Federal Stimulus Program’, Council will forfeit the funding if further delays are experienced for construction

iv)       

·    The existing location of the crossing at the frontage of the service station results in queuing across the crossing by waiting vehicles to turn into the service station entrance. Also, exiting vehicles from the service station exit driveway just south of the crossing create safety concerns for pedestrians using the crossing. This necessitates the relocation of the crossing as approved to improve pedestrian safety.

 

Based on the above, it is necessary that the originally approved option be confirmed for the location for relocation. However, two options are provided for traffic committee to consider.

Attachments

1.      CTC-21-208 – Blaxcell Street, Granville – Review of proposed relocation of the pedestrian crossing and associated signage – Federal Stimulus Program  

2.      CTC-21-208 – Minutes of traffic committee item